Forms Experience BuilderApplication · Ibm

CVE-2014-6169

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-04-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Forms Experience Builder 8.5.0 and 8.5.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. IBM X-Force ID: 97777.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Forms Experience Builder versions 8.5.0 and 8.5.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified user input vectors. This is a classic reflected or stored XSS flaw where the application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in HTML context.

MitigationRemediate by implementing proper input validation and output encoding across all user input fields and URL parameters in IBM Forms Experience Builder. Apply context-specific escaping for HTML, JavaScript, and URL attributes, and consider implementing a Content Security Policy (CSP) as a defense-in-depth measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Forms Experience BuilderApplication
Affected:= 8.5= 8.5.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm IBM Forms Experience Builder is installed
    Check for the IBM Forms Experience Builder installation directory or identify the product via your software inventory system. Common installation paths may include IBM WebSphere Application Server directories where Forms is deployed.
    Affected if IBM Forms Experience Builder software is present on the system
  2. Identify the installed version
    Locate the version information for IBM Forms Experience Builder. This is typically found in the product's about page, version.info file, or through the WebSphere Administration Console if deployed as a WebSphere application.
    Affected if The installed version is 8.5.0 or 8.5.1 specifically
  3. Verify the web interface is accessible
    Determine if the IBM Forms Experience Builder web interface is accessible to users or attackers. Check if the application URL is exposed on network ports or through a reverse proxy.
    Affected if The web interface is reachable and accepts user input
  4. Test for XSS vulnerability in user input fields
    Using a web browser or testing tool, submit benign HTML or script payloads (such as <script>alert(1)</script>) into common user input fields within the Forms Experience Builder interface, then inspect if these payloads are rendered as raw HTML or executed.
    Affected if User-supplied input is reflected back in the response without proper encoding or sanitization
  5. Review application logs for suspicious activity
    Examine IBM Forms Experience Builder and WebSphere Application Server logs for any evidence of XSS probe attempts or unusual script injection patterns in request parameters.
    Affected if Logs show unsanitized input being processed and reflected

Your environment is affected if IBM Forms Experience Builder versions 8.5.0 or 8.5.1 are installed and the web interface is accessible with user input fields that are not properly sanitized before being rendered in HTML output.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Remediate by implementing proper input validation and output encoding across all user input fields and URL parameters in IBM Forms Experience Builder. Apply context-specific escaping for HTML, JavaScript, and URL attributes, and consider implementing a Content Security Policy (CSP) as a defense-in-depth measure.

Fix this in Forms Experience Builder Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-6169 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-6169 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data