JunosOperating system · Juniper

CVE-2014-6386

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-01-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Juniper Junos 11.4 before 11.4R8, 12.1X44 before 12.1X44-D35, 12.1X45 before 12.1X45-D25, 12.1X46 before 12.1X46-D20, 12.1X47 before 12.1X47-D10, 12.2 before 12.2R9, 12.3R2 before 12.3R2-S3, 12.3 before 12.3R3, 13.1 before 13.1R4, and 13.2 before 13.2R1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and rpd restart) via a crafted BGP FlowSpec prefix.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Juniper Junos contains a denial of service vulnerability in the BGP FlowSpec (Flow Specification) implementation. Remote attackers can send a specially crafted BGP FlowSpec prefix that triggers an assertion failure, causing the routing protocol daemon (rpd) to restart and disrupt routing services.

MitigationUpgrade Junos to the fixed versions: 11.4R8, 12.1X44-D35, 12.1X45-D25, 12.1X46-D20, 12.1X47-D10, 12.2R9, 12.3R3 (or 12.3R2-S3+), 13.1R4, or 13.2R1 and later. Consider disabling BGP FlowSpec if upgrades are not immediately feasible.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JunosOperating system
Affected:= 11.4= 12.1x44= 12.1x45= 12.1x46= 12.1x47= 12.2= 12.3= 13.1= 13.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Junos version
    Run 'show version' or 'request system version' command on the Juniper device
    Affected if Version matches 11.4, 12.1x44, 12.1x45, 12.1x46, 12.1x47, 12.2, 12.3, 13.1, or 13.2 (without the fixed updates)
  2. Verify BGP FlowSpec configuration
    Run 'show configuration protocols bgp' and look for 'flow-spec-validation' or 'family inet flow' under the BGP hierarchy
    Affected if BGP FlowSpec is enabled under the BGP protocol configuration
  3. Confirm BGP peer status
    Run 'show bgp summary' to see if BGP peers are established and accepting connections
    Affected if BGP peers are up and exchanging routes, particularly if FlowSpec prefixes can be received from untrusted peers

Device is affected if running a listed Junos version AND BGP FlowSpec is enabled with BGP peers that could send malicious FlowSpec prefixes.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Junos to the fixed versions: 11.4R8, 12.1X44-D35, 12.1X45-D25, 12.1X46-D20, 12.1X47-D10, 12.2R9, 12.3R3 (or 12.3R2-S3+), 13.1R4, or 13.2R1 and later. Consider disabling BGP FlowSpec if upgrades are not immediately feasible.

Fix this in Junos Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-6386 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-6386 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data