CVE-2014-6817
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Cove (aka org.covechurch.app) application 1.0.2 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Cove Android application 1.0.2 fails to validate X.509 certificates from SSL servers, enabling man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept traffic by presenting fraudulent certificates and capture sensitive data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cove app versionOn Android device, go to Settings > Apps > Covechurch Cove, or use ADB command: 'adb shell dumpsys package com.covechurch.cove | grep versionName'Affected if VersionName equals 1.0.2 exactly
-
Confirm network permissionsReview AndroidManifest.xml for INTERNET permission, or check app permissions on device under Settings > Apps > PermissionsAffected if INTERNET permission is granted to the app
-
Verify SSL certificate validation existsPerform static analysis of the app APK using tools like jadx or apktool to inspect the code for TrustManager, X509TrustManager, or hostname verifier implementations. Look for proper certificate chain validation logic.Affected if No custom TrustManager or X509TrustManager is implemented, or validation logic is missing/bypassed
-
Test for certificate validation bypassConfigure a proxy like Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP with an invalid/fraudulent certificate and attempt to intercept traffic from the app. Observe if the app accepts the invalid certificate without warning.Affected if App accepts invalid SSL certificates and completes connections without certificate validation errors
User is affected if Covechurch Cove version 1.0.2 is installed, the app has network permissions, and SSL certificate validation is missing or improperly implemented (app accepts invalid certificates).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper SSL/TLS certificate validation in the application, preferably through certificate pinning or ensuring proper trust manager configuration to verify server certificate chains.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-6817 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-6817 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data