KamkomesanApplication · Kamkomesan Project

CVE-2014-6824

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-09-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The kamkomesan (aka com.anek.kamkomesan) application 1.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The kamkomesan Android application version 1.0 fails to validate X.509 certificates from SSL/TLS servers. This means the app accepts any certificate presented by a server without verification, allowing attackers positioned on the same network to intercept communications by presenting a fraudulent certificate.

MitigationImplement proper SSL/TLS certificate validation using certificate pinning or standard X.509 certificate chain verification to ensure the app only trusts legitimate server certificates.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
KamkomesanApplication
Affected:= 1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if kamkomesan app is installed
    On the Android device, go to Settings > Apps > All Apps and search for 'kamkomesan', or use ADB command: `adb shell pm list packages | grep kamkomesan`
    Affected if The package named 'com.kamkomesan' or similar kamkomesan package is present on the device
  2. Determine installed version
    Use ADB command: `adb shell dumpsys package com.kamkomesan` (replace with actual package name found) or check the app info screen in Settings > Apps
    Affected if The version displayed is 1.0 exactly
  3. Inspect SSL/TLS certificate validation code
    Extract the APK using `adb pull /data/app/<package>/base.apk` then decompile using a tool like jadx or apktool. Navigate to network-related classes and examine any HttpClient, URLConnection, or HttpsURLConnection usage for setHostnameVerifier or setTrustManager methods
    Affected if The code shows NO certificate validation (no custom TrustManager, no HostnameVerifier, or accepts all certificates with a trusting implementation)
  4. Check for proper X.509 certificate chain validation
    In the decompiled source, search for certificate-related methods such as 'TrustManagerFactory', 'KeyStore', or 'X509TrustManager'. Check if proper chain validation is implemented or if a custom TrustManager blindly accepts all certificates
    Affected if No proper X.509 certificate chain validation is implemented, or a custom TrustManager overrides validation to accept all certificates

The environment is affected if the kamkomesan Android app version 1.0 is installed and its code does not perform proper SSL/TLS certificate validation, allowing any certificate to be accepted.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper SSL/TLS certificate validation using certificate pinning or standard X.509 certificate chain verification to ensure the app only trusts legitimate server certificates.

Fix this in Kamkomesan Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-6824 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-6824 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data