Trial TrackerApplication · Trialtracker

CVE-2014-6860

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-10-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Trial Tracker (aka com.etcweb.android.trial_tracker) application 1.1.9 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Trial Tracker Android application version 1.9.9 does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept encrypted communications by presenting a forged certificate and obtain sensitive information.

MitigationImplement proper X.509 certificate chain validation and hostname verification in the Android application's network layer, preferably with certificate pinning for enhanced security.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Trial TrackerApplication
Affected:= 1.1.9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Trial Tracker app version
    Check the installed version of the Trial Tracker app on the Android device. Go to Settings > Apps > Trial Tracker and view the version information. Alternatively, use ADB: adb shell pm list packages | grep trialtracker, then adb shell dumpsys package [packagename] to see versionName.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.1.9 exactly (versionName = 1.1.9)
  2. Confirm network communication capability
    Review the app's requested permissions in AndroidManifest.xml or through app settings. Look for INTERNET permission which enables network communication.
    Affected if The app has INTERNET permission and communicates with remote servers over SSL/HTTPS
  3. Inspect certificate validation implementation
    Analyze the app's network code (smali/decompiled Java classes) for SSL/TLS handling. Search for implementations of TrustManager, X509TrustManager, orHostnameVerifier. Look for custom implementations that bypass default certificate chain validation.
    Affected if The app uses a custom TrustManager that accepts all certificates or does not validate the certificate chain, or lacks hostname verification entirely

If Trial Tracker version 1.1.9 is installed and it makes SSL/HTTPS connections without proper X.509 certificate chain and hostname validation, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper X.509 certificate chain validation and hostname verification in the Android application's network layer, preferably with certificate pinning for enhanced security.

Fix this in Trial Tracker Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-6860 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-6860 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data