CVE-2014-6931
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Treves Dance Center (aka com.myapphone.android.myapptrvesdancecenter) application 1.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Treves Dance Center Android application version 1.0 fails to validate X.509 certificates from SSL servers, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept encrypted communications by presenting crafted fraudulent certificates and obtain sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if the vulnerable app is presentSearch Android devices or mobile device management (MDM) systems for an application named 'Treves Dance Center' or 'Myapp Treves Dance Center' version 1.0Affected if The app version 1.0 is installed on any Android device in the environment
-
Inspect the app's network security configurationFor the installed APK, examine the AndroidManifest.xml and any network_security_config.xml for certificate validation settings. Look for 'android:allowCleartextTraffic' and custom TrustManager implementationsAffected if The app allows cleartext traffic or disables certificate validation via custom TrustManager or hostname verifier
-
Analyze SSL/TLS implementation in app codeDecompile the APK and review code that handles HTTPS connections. Search for implementations of TrustManager, X509TrustManager, or HostnameVerifier that bypass validationAffected if The code contains custom TrustManager that accepts all certificates or skips hostname verification
-
Test for certificate validation failureSet up a man-in-the-middle proxy (such as Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP) and attempt to intercept traffic from the app to its backend serverAffected if The app successfully connects through the proxy without certificate validation errors, demonstrating the vulnerability
-
Check for certificate pinningReview the app code for certificate pinning implementation using frameworks like OkHttp's CertificatePinner or similar mechanismsAffected if No certificate pinning is implemented and the app accepts arbitrary certificates
A user is affected if the Treves Dance Center Android app version 1.0 is installed and the app fails to validate SSL certificates, allowing intercepted communications.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper SSL certificate validation in the Android application, including chain-of-trust verification and hostname validation, or use certificate pinning for known endpoints.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-6931 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-6931 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data