CVE-2014-7054
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe musica de barrios sonideros (aka com.nobexinc.wls_93155702.rc) application 3.3.10 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Android application 'musica de barrios sonideros' version 3.3.10 fails to validate X.509 certificates from SSL servers, enabling man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof legitimate servers and intercept sensitive data transmitted over what should be encrypted connections.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.3.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if the app is installedOn the Android device, go to Settings > Apps > All Apps, or use ADB command: 'adb shell pm list packages' to list all installed packages. Look for packages containing 'musica', 'barrios', 'sonideros', or 'nobex'.Affected if The app with name containing 'musica de barrios sonideros' or 'Nobexrc Musica De Barrios Sonideros' is found on the device
-
Check installed version numberIn Settings > Apps > [App Name] > Version info, or use ADB: 'adb shell dumpsys package [package_name]' to retrieve version information. Look for versionCode or versionName.Affected if Version is exactly 3.3.10 (versionName = 3.3.10)
-
Confirm vulnerable SSL implementation existsIf the app is version 3.3.10, use a network testing tool (such as a proxy like Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP) to test SSL/TLS connections. Attempt to intercept traffic using a self-signed certificate. If the app accepts the untrusted certificate without warning, the SSL validation vulnerability is present.Affected if The app accepts untrusted/invalid SSL certificates and establishes connections without certificate validation errors
You are affected if the Android app 'musica de barrios sonideros' or 'Nobexrc Musica De Barrios Sonideros' version 3.3.10 is installed on your device and it accepts untrusted SSL certificates during network communication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper SSL certificate validation in the Android app, including certificate chain verification and hostname validation, and consider certificate pinning for additional security.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7054 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7054 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data