Bikers RomagnaApplication · Bikersromagna

CVE-2014-7063

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-10-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Bikers Romagna (aka com.bikers.romagna) application 1.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Bikers Romagna Android application version 1.0 fails to validate X.509 certificates from SSL servers, allowing attackers to intercept sensitive data by presenting fraudulent certificates in a man-in-the-middle attack. The app essentially accepts any certificate presented by the server, bypassing the fundamental SSL/TLS trust model.

MitigationImplement proper X.509 certificate validation using a custom TrustManager that validates the certificate chain, or employ certificate pinning to trust only specific certificates or public keys.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Bikers RomagnaApplication
Affected:= 1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Bikers Romagna app version
    Check the app version in the device's Application Manager, Google Play Store listing, or by inspecting the APK file's metadata (versionName and versionCode in AndroidManifest.xml)
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0 (any build of version 1.0)
  2. Confirm the app uses network connections
    Review the app's AndroidManifest.xml for INTERNET permission and any network-related permissions. Observe network traffic using a proxy or packet capture tool to verify SSL/TLS connections are being made to remote servers
    Affected if The app establishes SSL/TLS connections to remote servers without validating certificates
  3. Test for certificate validation bypass
    Perform a man-in-the-middle test using a proxy with a self-signed or untrusted certificate. Attempt to intercept SSL traffic between the app and its server. If the app accepts the untrusted certificate and completes the connection, certificate validation is not properly implemented
    Affected if The app accepts and completes connections using invalid, self-signed, or untrusted certificates
  4. Verify proper certificate validation implementation
    If possible, inspect the app's source code or decompiled APK for custom TrustManager implementations, certificate pinning logic, or check if the default SSLContext is properly configured with a validating TrustManager
    Affected if No proper X.509 certificate validation is found in the code (no custom TrustManager, no certificate pinning, or validation is disabled/overridden)

A user is affected if they have Bikers Romagna version 1.0 installed and the app communicates over SSL/TLS without properly validating server certificates, allowing potential interception of sensitive data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper X.509 certificate validation using a custom TrustManager that validates the certificate chain, or employ certificate pinning to trust only specific certificates or public keys.

Fix this in Bikers Romagna Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7063 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7063 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data