Www.sm3ny.comApplication · Sm3ny

CVE-2014-7100

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-10-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The www.sm3ny.com (aka sm3ny.com) application 1.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The SM3NY Android application version 1.0 fails to validate X.509 certificates from SSL servers during HTTPS connections. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept traffic by presenting fraudulent certificates, enabling them to spoof legitimate servers and capture sensitive data transmitted by the app.

MitigationImplement proper X.509 certificate chain validation in the Android application using a custom TrustManager that validates the complete certificate chain, or implement certificate pinning to trust only specific certificates or public key hashes for the application's SSL endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Www.sm3ny.comApplication
Affected:= 1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check SM3NY app version
    Open Android Settings > Apps > SM3ny and note the version number, or use 'adb shell dumpsys package com.sm3ny.app' to retrieve version info
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0 (the only affected version listed)
  2. Verify app uses HTTPS
    Use a network proxy (like Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP) or Android network capture tools to intercept traffic from the SM3NY app. Check if HTTPS connections are made to sm3ny.com endpoints
    Affected if The app uses HTTPS connections to sm3ny.com but the CVE indicates certificate validation is missing, so MITM is possible regardless of HTTPS use
  3. Inspect certificate validation in app code
    Decompile the APK using tools like apktool, then review the source code for SSL/TLS implementation. Look for custom TrustManager implementations and verify if validateServerCertificate() or similar validation methods properly check the certificate chain
    Affected if No custom TrustManager is implemented, or the TrustManager implementation accepts all certificates without validation (check for empty or trivially passing validation logic)
  4. Test for certificate validation failure
    Install a root CA certificate on the Android device and configure a proxy to intercept HTTPS traffic. Attempt to intercept connections to sm3ny.com. If the app connects successfully without certificate warnings, validation is missing
    Affected if The app successfully connects through the proxy without presenting certificate validation errors, indicating the app accepts the proxy's fraudulent certificate

The environment is affected if the SM3NY Android app version 1.0 is installed and it accepts HTTPS connections without proper X.509 certificate chain validation, which can be confirmed by successful MITM interception.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper X.509 certificate chain validation in the Android application using a custom TrustManager that validates the complete certificate chain, or implement certificate pinning to trust only specific certificates or public key hashes for the application's SSL endpoints.

Fix this in Www.sm3ny.com Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7100 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7100 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data