Intelligent SmeApplication · Magzter

CVE-2014-7314

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-10-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Intelligent SME (aka com.magzter.intelligentsme) application 3.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Intelligent SME Android application version 3.0 fails to validate SSL/TLS server certificates, allowing an attacker on the same network to intercept encrypted communications by presenting a forged certificate. This enables man-in-the-middle attacks where sensitive credentials or data can be stolen.

MitigationImplement proper X.509 certificate validation using Android's CertificateManager and TrustManager, or enable network security config with custom trust anchors to ensure the app verifies server certificates before establishing SSL connections.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Intelligent SmeApplication
Affected:= 3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed app version
    Open Android Settings > Apps > Magzter Intelligent SME, or use ADB command: 'adb shell dumpsys package com.magzter.intelligentsme' to view versionInfo. Check if versionCode or versionName equals 3.0.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 3.0 or falls within the = 3 version range
  2. Verify SSL validation is disabled in app code
    Decompile the APK using apktool or similar tool. Inspect the source code for TrustManager implementation, specifically checking if validateServerCertificate() method properly verifies certificates or is empty/always returns true. Also check if the app uses a custom TrustManager that bypasses validation.
    Affected if The app implements a TrustManager that accepts all certificates or skips certificate chain validation
  3. Check network security configuration
    Inspect the AndroidManifest.xml and any network_security_config.xml for trustAnchors or debug-overrides settings that may allow untrusted certificates.
    Affected if Network security config disables certificate validation or allows user-installed CA certificates for the app's domain traffic
  4. Test SSL/TLS certificate validation behavior
    Set up a test environment with a proxy like Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP using a self-signed certificate. Configure the device to trust the proxy CA. Attempt to intercept traffic from the app to its backend server.
    Affected if The app accepts the proxy's self-signed certificate and traffic flows without certificate validation errors, indicating the vulnerability is present

The user is affected if the installed app version is 3.0 and the app does not properly validate SSL/TLS server certificates, which can be confirmed by observing that the app accepts self-signed or forged certificates during a MITM test.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper X.509 certificate validation using Android's CertificateManager and TrustManager, or enable network security config with custom trust anchors to ensure the app verifies server certificates before establishing SSL connections.

Fix this in Intelligent Sme Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7314 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7314 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data