dbcve.org
Tus 1947 RadisApplication · Tus Radis

CVE-2014-7367

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-10-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The TuS 1947 Radis (aka com.tus1947radis) application 1.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The TuS 1947 Radis Android application version 1.0 fails to validate X.509 certificates during SSL/TLS connections, allowing attackers to perform man-in-the-middle attacks and intercept or modify traffic by presenting fraudulent certificates.

MitigationImplement proper SSL certificate validation using certificate pinning or standard X.509 certificate chain verification to ensure the app only trusts legitimate server certificates.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Tus 1947 RadisApplication
Affected:= 1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if TuS 1947 Radis app is installed
    On the Android device, go to Settings > Apps > All Apps and search for 'Radis' or '1947 Radis', or use adb command: pm list packages | grep -i radis
    Affected if The package named com.tus1947.radis or similar is found installed on the device
  2. Verify the installed app version is 1.0
    In Settings > Apps > All Apps > Radis, check the version under 'App info' or use: adb shell dumpsys package com.tus1947.radis | grep versionName
    Affected if The displayed version is exactly 1.0
  3. Confirm the app uses network connections
    Check if the app has network permissions by reviewing AndroidManifest.xml or using: adb shell dumpsys package com.tus1947.radis | grep -i permission
    Affected if The app holds INTERNET permission and makes SSL/TLS connections to remote servers

The device is affected if the TuS 1947 Radis Android application version 1.0 is installed and the app communicates over SSL/TLS, since version 1.0 lacks proper X.509 certificate validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper SSL certificate validation using certificate pinning or standard X.509 certificate chain verification to ensure the app only trusts legitimate server certificates.

Fix this in Tus 1947 Radis Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7367 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7367 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data