dbcve.org
Inspire WeddingsApplication · Magzter

CVE-2014-7373

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-10-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Inspire Weddings (aka com.magzter.inspireweddings) application 3.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Inspire Weddings Android app version 3.0 fails to validate X.509 certificates during SSL/TLS connections, allowing attackers to perform man-in-the-middle attacks by presenting fraudulent certificates. This enables sensitive data interception and server spoofing.

MitigationImplement proper SSL certificate validation using a TrustManager that validates certificates against trusted Certificate Authorities, ideally combined with certificate pinning for enhanced security.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Inspire WeddingsApplication
Affected:= 3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if Inspire Weddings app is installed
    On Android device: Go to Settings > Apps > Apps, or use ADB command 'adb shell pm list packages | grep -i inspire'. Check app version in app info screen under 'Version' or 'VersionName'.
    Affected if The app 'Magzter Inspire Weddings' or similar package containing 'inspire' and 'weddings' is installed with version 3.0 or 3 (exact version match required)
  2. Verify app has network permissions
    Decompile APK using apktool or use 'aapt dump badging inspire_weddings.apk' to inspect AndroidManifest.xml. Look for 'android.permission.INTERNET' permission.
    Affected if The app has INTERNET permission, which is required for the SSL validation flaw to be exploitable over the network
  3. Inspect SSL certificate validation code
    Decompile the APK and examine source code for SSL/TLS implementation. Search for HttpsURLConnection, TrustManager, or hostnameVerifier usage. Look for custom implementations that may bypass validation.
    Affected if Code contains custom TrustManager or HostnameVerifier that accepts all certificates, or lacks certificate chain validation entirely (e.g., TrustManager that only checks if certificate is not null)
  4. Test SSL validation behavior
    Use a proxy tool like Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP with a self-signed certificate to intercept traffic from the app. Configure proxy to present an invalid/fraudulent certificate.
    Affected if The app successfully establishes connections through the proxy with an invalid certificate, indicating certificate validation is not occurring
  5. Check for certificate pinning
    Examine the app's network security configuration and code for certificate pinning implementation. Look for pinning libraries or custom X509TrustManager implementations.
    Affected if No certificate pinning is implemented, and the app accepts connections to arbitrary certificates from untrusted CAs

The environment is affected if Magzter Inspire Weddings version 3.0 is installed and the app accepts SSL connections with invalid or self-signed certificates without user warning.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper SSL certificate validation using a TrustManager that validates certificates against trusted Certificate Authorities, ideally combined with certificate pinning for enhanced security.

Fix this in Inspire Weddings Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
19.0 hours of engineering $3,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7373 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7373 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data