CVE-2014-7378
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Jobranco (aka com.jobranco) application 1.1 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jobranco Android application version 1.1 fails to validate X.509 certificates when establishing SSL/TLS connections to remote servers. This allows an attacker positioned on the same network to intercept and modify traffic by presenting a forged certificate, enabling credential theft or data injection.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Jobranco app versionCheck the installed version of the Jobranco application on the Android device. Go to Settings > Apps > Jobranco and view the version information. Confirm it is exactly version 1.1.Affected if The installed version is Jobranco 1.1
-
Confirm network connectivity usageDetermine if the Jobranco app has been used to connect to remote servers or if it communicates over the network. Review app permissions and any network activity logs.Affected if The app transmits data to remote servers over network connections
-
Test SSL certificate validationUse a network interception tool (such as a proxy with a self-signed certificate) while the app communicates with its server. Observe whether the app accepts the invalid certificate or rejects the connection.Affected if The app accepts an invalid or self-signed certificate without warning or error, indicating certificate validation is not performed
-
Inspect app network implementationIf reverse engineering is possible, examine the app's network code for SSL/TLS implementation. Look for uses of custom TrustManager, empty hostname verifiers, or missing certificate validation logic in the source code or decompiled APK.Affected if The code lacks proper X.509 certificate validation or uses insecure custom implementations
A user is affected if the Jobranco Android app version 1.1 is installed and makes network connections without properly validating SSL/TLS certificates.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper SSL certificate validation using standard Android networking APIs with certificate pinning or full chain verification to ensure the app only accepts certificates from trusted Certificate Authorities.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7378 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7378 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data