CVE-2014-7403
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe NZHondas.com (aka com.tapatalk.nzhondascom) application 3.6.14 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Android application NZHondas.com (com.tapatalk.nzhondascom) version 3.6.14 fails to validate X.509 certificates from SSL servers, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept encrypted communications by presenting fraudulent certificates and capture sensitive data transmitted by the app.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.6.14CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed app versionOn the Android device, go to Settings > Apps > NZHondas.com (or com.tapatalk.nzhondascom) and check the version number listed under App InfoAffected if The version displayed is exactly 3.6.14
-
Inspect the app's SSL certificate validation implementationDecompile the APK and examine the source code for the use of custom TrustManager implementations or check if hostname verification is disabled (e.g., setHostnameVerifier(ALLOW_ALL_HOSTNAME_VERIFIER))Affected if The code uses a custom TrustManager that does not validate certificate chains, or disables hostname verification
-
Check for insecure TrustManager configurationsSearch the decompiled code for TrustManager implementations - look for classes that implement X509TrustManager but do not perform proper chain validation in the checkServerTrusted() methodAffected if The TrustManager implementation accepts all certificates without proper validation or throws no exceptions for invalid chains
-
Verify hostname verification settingsExamine the code for HttpsURLConnection or HttpClient setups to see if setHostnameVerifier is used with a permissive verifier like AllowAllHostnameVerifier or equivalentAffected if Hostname verification is disabled or set to accept any hostname
The environment is affected if the NZHondas.com app version 3.6.14 is installed and the app's code contains custom TrustManager or hostname verification configurations that bypass standard SSL/TLS certificate validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper SSL/TLS certificate chain validation using Android's standard TrustManager and hostname verification APIs to ensure the app verifies server certificates against trusted Certificate Authorities.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7403 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7403 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data