CVE-2014-7441
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Pakan Ken Tube (aka com.PakanKen) application 0.1 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Pakan Ken Tube Android application version 0.1 fails to validate X.509 certificates from SSL servers, accepting any certificate presented without verification. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers on the same network to intercept and manipulate SSL/TLS traffic by presenting forged certificates, enabling server spoofing and sensitive data theft.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Pakan Ken Tube app is installedCheck Android device or app inventory for 'Pakan Ken Tube' or 'com.pakan.kentube' package nameAffected if App is present on device
-
Confirm installed version is 0.1Use package manager (adb shell pm list packages, then adb shell dumpsys package <pkg>) or check app info in device settings to find exact versionAffected if Version equals 0.1 exactly
-
Inspect network security configurationDecompile APK and examine AndroidManifest.xml for android:allowBackup and network-related permissions; check for network_security_config.xml or custom TrustManager implementationsAffected if App implements a custom TrustManager that overrides default validation or uses a custom SSLSocketFactory that accepts all certificates
-
Check for insecure SSL/TLS implementation in codeDecompile APK and search source code for patterns like 'ALLOW_ALL_HOSTNAME_VERIFIER', 'TrustAllSocketFactory', or null TrustManager implementationsAffected if Code contains implementations that bypass certificate chain validation or hostname verification
A user is affected if the Pakan Ken Tube Android app version 0.1 is installed and its code contains custom certificate validation that accepts any certificate without verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper certificate validation including chain-of-trust verification and hostname validation, preferably with certificate pinning for sensitive endpoints.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7441 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7441 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data