Translation WidgetApplication · Translation Widget Project

CVE-2014-7501

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-10-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Translation Widget (aka com.wTranslationGadget) application 0.1 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Translation Widget Android application fails to validate X.509 certificates when establishing SSL/TLS connections, allowing any certificate (including attacker-controlled ones) to be accepted. This enables man-in-the-middle attacks where attackers can intercept and decrypt sensitive communications between the app and backend servers.

MitigationImplement proper SSL certificate validation using a TrustManager that verifies the certificate chain against trusted Certificate Authorities, or implement certificate pinning for known server certificates.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Translation WidgetApplication
Affected:= 0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Translation Widget version
    Check the installed version of the Translation Widget Android application on the device. On Android, this can be done via Settings > Apps > Translation Widget, or by using ADB: adb shell dumpsys package com.translationwidget | grep versionName
    Affected if The installed version is 0.1 (Translation Widget = 0.1)
  2. Verify SSL certificate validation is disabled in network security config
    Inspect the app's network_security_config.xml (or network security configuration) for settings that disable certificate validation. Check for usesCleartextTraffic or trustAnchors configurations that bypass validation.
    Affected if The network security config allows unvalidated certificates or cleartext traffic to sensitive endpoints
  3. Examine SSL/TLS implementation in app code
    Decompile or inspect the APK (using tools like jadx, apktool, or Androguard). Look for HttpURLConnection, HttpsURLConnection, or network library usage. Check if custom TrustManager or HostnameVerifier implementations bypass validation (e.g., empty implementation, returning true for all checks).
    Affected if The code contains a TrustManager that accepts all certificates or a HostnameVerifier that accepts any hostname
  4. Test for MITM vulnerability with traffic interception
    Configure a proxy (such as Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP) with a self-signed certificate and route the device's traffic through it. Attempt to intercept communications from the Translation Widget app.
    Affected if The app successfully connects and transmits data through the proxy with an untrusted certificate, indicating certificate validation is not occurring
  5. Check for certificate pinning implementation
    Search the decompiled app code for certificate pinning implementations (e.g., Sha256Pin, CertificatePinner in OkHttp, or custom pinning logic). Verify if pinned certificates match expected server certificates.
    Affected if No certificate pinning is implemented and certificate validation is missing

A defender is affected if they have Translation Widget version 0.1 installed AND the app accepts SSL/TLS connections with invalid or untrusted certificates, allowing traffic interception.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper SSL certificate validation using a TrustManager that verifies the certificate chain against trusted Certificate Authorities, or implement certificate pinning for known server certificates.

Fix this in Translation Widget Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7501 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7501 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data