CVE-2014-7525
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Domain Name Search & Web Host (aka com.wDomainNameSearchandRegistration) application 0.64.13398.55733 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Android application 'Domain Name Search & Web Host' (com.wDomainNameSearchandRegistration) fails to validate X.509 certificates from SSL/TLS servers, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept sensitive data by presenting fraudulent certificates.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.64.13398.55733CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if the vulnerable app is installedRun 'adb shell pm list packages | grep wDomainNameSearchandRegistration' or check device app list for 'com.wDomainNameSearchandRegistration'Affected if The package com.wDomainNameSearchandRegistration is present on the device
-
Check installed app versionRun 'adb shell dumpsys package com.wDomainNameSearchandRegistration' and locate the versionName or versionCode fieldAffected if The installed version matches 0.64.13398.55733
-
Compare version to affected rangeCompare your installed version against the affected version 0.64.13398.55733Affected if The installed version is 0.64.13398.55733 exactly (since the '=' indicates a single affected version)
-
Inspect network security configurationExtract and analyze the APK using 'apktool d <apk>.apk' and review AndroidManifest.xml for network security settings, then check source code or smali for SSL validation logic using 'grep -r "TrustManager\|X509TrustManager\|hostnameVerifier"'Affected if The app lacks proper X.509 certificate validation implementation in its network code or uses an empty TrustManager that accepts all certificates
A user is affected if the app 'Domain Name Search & Web Host' (com.wDomainNameSearchandRegistration) version 0.64.13398.55733 is installed and the app does not implement proper SSL/TLS certificate validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper SSL certificate validation using Android's certificate pinning or trusted CA store validation to ensure the app verifies server certificates before establishing secure connections.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7525 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7525 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data