CVE-2014-7551
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Noticias Bebes Beybies (aka com.beybies) application 1.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Noticias Bebes Beybies Android application 1.0 fails to validate X.509 certificates when establishing SSL/TLS connections, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept traffic by presenting arbitrary certificates and capture sensitive data transmitted to backend servers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if the vulnerable app is installedSearch for the application 'Noticias Bebes Beybies' or 'Avexim Noticias Bebes Beybies' on Android devices or in an app inventory. Use package manager commands (e.g., 'pm list packages' or check device management tools) to confirm presence.Affected if The app version 1.0 is present on any device or system under your management.
-
Locate the application binaryObtain the APK file for 'Noticias Bebes Beybies' version 1.0 from the device, a backup, or the original distribution source for static analysis.Affected if You cannot obtain the APK for analysis.
-
Inspect SSL/TLS certificate validation codeDecompile the APK and examine the source code for the TrustManager implementation, specifically looking for custom TrustManager classes or code that bypasses certificate chain validation. Search for patterns like custom X509TrustManager implementations that accept all certificates or empty validation logic.Affected if The code contains a custom TrustManager that accepts all certificates or performs no validation (e.g., empty checkServerTrusted methods or no exception handling for certificate errors).
-
Check for insecure network security configExamine the AndroidManifest.xml and any network_security_config.xml for insecure configurations, particularly 'android:allowCleartextTraffic' and TrustManager settings.Affected if The app is configured to allow cleartext traffic or uses a non-validating TrustManager.
If the app 'Noticias Bebes Beybies' version 1.0 is present and its code contains a TrustManager that does not validate certificate chains, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper SSL certificate validation in the Android application using certificate pinning or a properly configured TrustManager that validates the certificate chain against trusted CAs.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7551 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7551 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data