CVE-2014-7610
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Kadinlar Kulubu KKMobileApp (aka com.tapatalk.kadinlarkulubucom) application 3.4.3 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Kadinlar Kulubu KKMobileApp Android application version 3.4.3 fails to validate X.509 certificates from SSL servers during HTTPS connections, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept communications by presenting forged certificates and capture sensitive data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Kadinlar Kulubu KKMobileApp is installedCheck mobile device inventories or enumerate installed applications on Android devices for the package name associated with Kadinlar Kulubu KKMobileAppAffected if The application is present on any device in the environment
-
Determine the installed application versionOn Android, use package manager commands (pm dump <package> | grep versionName) or check the app's details in Settings > Apps to verify the version numberAffected if The installed version is exactly 3.4.3
-
Verify application handles sensitive data over networkReview application traffic or examine the app's functionality to determine if it transmits user credentials, personal information, financial data, or other sensitive content over HTTPS connectionsAffected if The app transmits any sensitive data over network connections while using this vulnerable version
-
Inspect certificate validation implementationIf you have access to the APK, decompile and examine the network layer code for TrustManager implementation, or use a network proxy tool to test whether the app accepts self-signed or forged certificatesAffected if The app accepts SSL/TLS connections without proper X.509 certificate chain validation
A user is affected if Kadinlar Kulubu KKMobileApp version 3.4.3 is installed and the app transmits sensitive data over HTTPS connections without proper certificate validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper X.509 certificate chain validation in the application's network layer using a custom TrustManager or certificate pinning to ensure the app verifies server certificates before establishing SSL/TLS connections.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7610 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7610 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data