CVE-2014-7719
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe BASEBALL MANAGER K (aka com.cjenm.yagamkgoogle) application 1.13 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe BASEBALL MANAGER K Android application version 1.13 fails to validate X.509 certificates during SSL/TLS connections, enabling man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept sensitive data by presenting forged certificates.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the installed version of Mobile Baseball Manager KOpen the app in Android Settings > Apps > Mobile Baseball Manager K, or use a package manager command (adb shell dumpsys package com.example.baseballmanagerk) to check the versionName in the package infoAffected if The version displayed is exactly 1.13
-
Confirm the app has network transmission capabilitiesInspect the AndroidManifest.xml for INTERNET permission, or view the app's declared permissions using 'adb shell dumpsys package' and look for android.permission.INTERNETAffected if The INTERNET permission is present in the app's permissions
-
Identify SSL/TLS connection implementation in the appIf you have the APK, decompile it using apktool or examine the source code. Search for javax.net.ssl usage, HttpsURLConnection, or any custom TrustManager implementations. Look for methods that handle certificate validation.Affected if The code uses custom TrustManager, disables hostname verification (setHostnameVerifier null), or uses an unverified TrustManager without proper X.509 validation
-
Check for certificate validation bypass patternsSearch the decompiled smali or source code for patterns like 'ALLOW_ALL_HOSTNAME_VERIFIER', 'TrustManager' implementations that return true without actual validation, or setCustomSSLVerification methodsAffected if Any code explicitly bypasses certificate validation or uses a TrustManager that does not perform standard X.509 chain validation
If Mobile Baseball Manager K version 1.13 is installed and the app transmits data over the network without proper X.509 certificate validation in its SSL/TLS implementation, the environment is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper SSL certificate validation using certificate pinning or standard X.509 trust manager validation in all network requests within the application.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7719 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7719 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data