CVE-2014-7722
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Indian Jeweller (aka com.magzter.indianjeweller) application 3.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Indian Jeweller Android application version 3.0 fails to validate X.509 certificates when establishing SSL/TLS connections. This allows an attacker performing a man-in-the-middle attack to present a malicious certificate and intercept sensitive data transmitted between the app and legitimate servers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Indian Jeweller app is installedCheck device's installed applications for 'Indian Jeweller' by Magzter. On Android, this can be done via Settings > Apps or by running: adb shell pm list packages | grep -i jewellerAffected if The app named 'Indian Jeweller' by Magzter is present on the device
-
Confirm installed version is 3.0Check the app version in the app's info page (Settings > Apps > Indian Jeweller) or via: adb shell dumpsys package com.magzter.indianjeweller | grep versionNameAffected if The installed version equals 3.0 exactly
-
Determine if app uses network connectionsMonitor network traffic or check app permissions for INTERNET permission in AndroidManifest.xml. On a rooted device, use: adb shell dumpsys package com.magzter.indianjeweller | grep -i permissionAffected if The app has INTERNET permission and makes outbound SSL/TLS connections to remote servers
-
Inspect SSL certificate validation implementationDecompile the APK and examine the network/SSL code. Look for implementations of X509TrustManager, check if custom TrustManager is present, and verify hostname verification is properly implemented in the HTTPS connection codeAffected if The app lacks proper X509TrustManager implementation or does not validate the server certificate chain and hostname during SSL/TLS connections
The user is affected if the Magzter Indian Jeweller app version 3.0 is installed and uses SSL/TLS connections without proper X.509 certificate validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper SSL certificate validation in the application by using certificate pinning or ensuring the default X509TrustManager correctly validates the server certificate chain and hostname.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7722 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7722 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data