CVE-2014-7851
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedoVirt 3.2.2 through 3.5.0 does not invalidate the restapi session after logout from the webadmin, which allows remote authenticated users with knowledge of another user's session data to gain that user's privileges by replacing their session token with that of another user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceoVirt 3.2.2-3.5.0 fails to invalidate REST API sessions when users log out from the webadmin interface. Authenticated attackers who obtain another user's session token can hijack that session by replacing their own token with the victim's, gaining full user privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.2.2= 3.3= 3.3.0.1= 3.3.1= 3.3.2= 3.3.3= 3.3.4= 3.3.5= 3.4.0= 3.4.1= 3.4.2= 3.4.3= 3.3.2= 3.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed oVirt Engine versionRun 'rpm -q ovirt-engine' or check the webadmin about page to obtain the exact version numberAffected if Version matches any of: 3.2.2, 3.3, 3.3.0.1, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.3.4, 3.3.5, 3.4.0, 3.4.1, 3.4.2, 3.4.3 (or falls between 3.2.2 and 3.5.0)
-
Verify session persistence after logoutLog into webadmin interface, obtain a REST API session token, then log out from webadmin. Using that same token, attempt a REST API call to the engineAffected if The REST API call succeeds with the previously obtained token after logout has completed
-
Check for session token reuseAs User A, obtain a REST API session. Log out from webadmin as User A. As User B, attempt to use User A's original session token to access the APIAffected if User B can successfully authenticate and access User A's session privileges using the token obtained before logout
System is affected if running a listed oVirt version AND REST API session tokens remain valid after user logs out from webadmin interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper session invalidation for REST API sessions upon webadmin logout, ensuring all session tokens are terminated and cannot be reused post-logout.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-7851 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-7851 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data