Unified Communications ManagerApplication · Cisco

CVE-2014-8008

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-01-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Absolute path traversal vulnerability in the Real-Time Monitoring Tool (RTMT) API in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a full pathname in an API command, aka Bug ID CSCur49414.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Absolute path traversal vulnerability in Cisco CUCM's Real-Time Monitoring Tool (RTMT) API allows authenticated remote users to read arbitrary files on the system by providing full pathnames in API commands. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of file path inputs in the RTMT API, enabling attackers with valid credentials to access sensitive system files beyond the intended scope.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for CSCur49414 to the CUCM installation. If patching is immediately unavailable, restrict network access to the RTMT API interface using ACLs and consider disabling RTMT external access until the patch can be deployed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Unified Communications ManagerApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco CUCM installation
    Check for Cisco Unified Communications Manager directories or services on the system. Look for installation paths such as /opt/cisco or check for CUCM-related processes or services.
    Affected if CUCM is installed and the RTMT API is network-accessible
  2. Verify RTMT service status
    Determine if the Real-Time Monitoring Tool service is running. On CUCM systems, this is typically handled by the RTMT service/process. Check via system service status or CUCM administration interface.
    Affected if RTMT service is running and accepting external connections
  3. Check RTMT API network exposure
    Identify open ports associated with RTMT. Default RTMT communication uses specific ports (typically 8443 for HTTPS, 8080 for HTTP in some configurations). Review firewall rules and listening services to determine if these ports are exposed externally.
    Affected if RTMT API ports are accessible from untrusted networks
  4. Confirm external authentication access
    Verify that RTMT API allows external authentication. Check whether the API accepts user credentials from remote sources and whether default or configured service accounts can authenticate remotely.
    Affected if RTMT accepts remote authentication credentials without additional network restrictions

A system is affected if Cisco CUCM is installed with RTMT enabled and the RTMT API interface is network-accessible to untrusted users, since all CUCM versions contain the path traversal flaw.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for CSCur49414 to the CUCM installation. If patching is immediately unavailable, restrict network access to the RTMT API interface using ACLs and consider disabling RTMT external access until the patch can be deployed.

Fix this in Unified Communications Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,300
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-8008 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-8008 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data