Unified Communications Domain ManagerApplication · Cisco

CVE-2014-8020

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-01-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco Unified Communication Domain Manager Platform Software allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption, and performance degradation or service outage) via a flood of malformed TCP packets and UDP packets, aka Bug ID CSCup25276.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The vulnerability allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a flood of malformed TCP and UDP packets to the Cisco Unified Communication Domain Manager Platform. These malformed packets consume CPU resources, leading to performance degradation or complete service outage.

MitigationApply the vendor patch from Cisco (Bug ID CSCup25276) when available, and implement network-level filtering or rate limiting at perimeter devices as a compensating control until the patch can be applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Unified Communications Domain ManagerApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm product identity
    Identify if the system is running Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager. Use commands such as 'show version' or check system documentation to verify the installed product name.
    Affected if The product is Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager (any version)
  2. Verify affected version range
    Check the installed version of Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager using 'show version' or the administrative web interface. Compare against the affected version range.
    Affected if Any version of Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager is installed (all versions are affected)
  3. Monitor CPU utilization
    Observe system CPU usage via 'show processes cpu history' or the system monitoring dashboard. Look for unusually high CPU consumption that correlates with network traffic.
    Affected if CPU utilization spikes during periods of incoming TCP/UDP traffic
  4. Inspect network traffic for malformed packets
    Capture and analyze incoming network packets using packet capture tools (tcpdump, Wireshark) at the network interface. Look for malformed TCP and UDP packets entering the environment.
    Affected if Malformed TCP or UDP packets are observed arriving at the Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager interface
  5. Check for service degradation
    Review system logs and performance metrics for signs of service degradation, slow response times, or connectivity issues that coincide with heavy network traffic.
    Affected if Service performance degrades during periods of incoming network traffic

The environment is affected if Cisco Unified Communications Domain Manager is running, as all versions of this product are vulnerable to the denial-of-service condition triggered by malformed TCP/UDP packets.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patch from Cisco (Bug ID CSCup25276) when available, and implement network-level filtering or rate limiting at perimeter devices as a compensating control until the patch can be applied.

Fix this in Unified Communications Domain Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-8020 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-8020 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data