Secure Access Control SystemApplication · Cisco

CVE-2014-8027

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-01-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The RBAC component in Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) allows remote authenticated users to obtain Network Device Administrator privileges for Create, Delete, Read, and Update operations via crafted HTTP requests, aka Bug ID CSCuq79034.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) component in Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) contains a privilege escalation vulnerability where remote authenticated users can obtain Network Device Administrator privileges for Create, Delete, Read, and Update operations through crafted HTTP requests. This allows unauthorized users to bypass their assigned role permissions and perform administrative-level operations.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for bug ID CSCuq79034. Until then, limit administrative access to ACS to trusted IP addresses only and closely audit user privilege assignments and administrative actions for signs of unauthorized privilege escalation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Secure Access Control SystemApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco ACS installation
    Locate the Cisco Secure ACS application in your environment - check for the ACS web interface, running services, or installation directories on Windows or Linux hosts
    Affected if Cisco Secure Access Control System is deployed in the environment
  2. Determine ACS version
    Access the ACS web console or use the CLI command 'show version' to retrieve the installed version number
    Affected if Any version of Cisco Secure ACS is running, since all versions are affected according to the CVE
  3. Verify RBAC is enabled
    Check the ACS configuration for Role-Based Access Control settings - typically found under Users and Identity Stores or Administration settings in the ACS web interface
    Affected if RBAC feature is configured and active in the ACS deployment
  4. Review user role assignments
    Examine user accounts and their assigned roles in the ACS administrative console, specifically looking for any accounts with Network Device Administrator privileges that may not have been intentionally granted
    Affected if Users possess elevated privileges (Create, Delete, Read, Update operations) beyond their intended role assignments
  5. Audit administrative action logs
    Review ACS logging and audit trails for administrative actions, particularly operations performed via HTTP that may indicate unauthorized privilege escalation attempts
    Affected if Administrative actions show operations performed by users whose assigned roles should not permit such activities

If Cisco Secure ACS is deployed in your environment, you are affected by this vulnerability since all versions contain the RBAC privilege escalation flaw.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for bug ID CSCuq79034. Until then, limit administrative access to ACS to trusted IP addresses only and closely audit user privilege assignments and administrative actions for signs of unauthorized privilege escalation.

Fix this in Secure Access Control System Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-8027 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-8027 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data