Foxit Pdf Sdk ActivexApplication · Foxitsoftware

CVE-2014-8074

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2014-10-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Buffer overflow in the SetLogFile method in Foxit.FoxitPDFSDKProCtrl.5 in Foxit PDF SDK ActiveX 2.3 through 5.0.1820 before 5.0.2.924 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long string, related to global variables.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Buffer overflow in the SetLogFile method of Foxit PDF SDK ActiveX control (Foxit.FoxitPDFSDKProCtrl.5) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an overly long string parameter, affecting versions 2.3 through 5.0.1820 before the 5.0.2.924 patch.

MitigationUpgrade Foxit PDF SDK to version 5.0.2.924 or later. If the ActiveX control is not required, disable or remove it to reduce attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Foxit Pdf Sdk ActivexApplication
Affected:= 2.3= 3.0= 4.0= 5.0.0= 5.0.1.820

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Foxit PDF SDK ActiveX is installed
    Search Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Classes for the ProgID 'Foxit.FoxitPDFSDKProCtrl.5' or check for its associated CLSID entry. Alternatively, examine the system for the ActiveX DLL file (typically named FoxitPDFSDKProCtrl.dll or similar).
    Affected if The ActiveX control is present in the system registry or as a DLL file.
  2. Retrieve the installed version number
    Inspect the version information of the ActiveX DLL file by right-clicking the file, selecting Properties, and viewing the Details tab, or use a PowerShell command to query the file version (for example: Get-ItemProperty on the DLL path).
    Affected if The version returned is 2.3, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0.0, or 5.0.1.820, or falls within the range 2.3 through 5.0.1820.
  3. Verify the SetLogFile method is exposed
    Check if the ActiveX control is registered as a browser add-on in Internet Explorer settings (Tools > Manage Add-ons), or examine the control's exposed COM interface for the SetLogFile method through a script or vulnerability scanner capable of enumerating ActiveX methods.
    Affected if The SetLogFile method is available and accessible through the ActiveX control interface.
  4. Confirm the control is enabled in the environment
    Review Internet Explorer security settings to determine whether the Foxit PDF SDK ActiveX control is allowed to run, or check group policy settings for ActiveX controls under Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Internet Explorer > Security Features.
    Affected if The ActiveX control is permitted to load and execute in the browser context.

A user is affected if the Foxit PDF SDK ActiveX control is installed with a version between 2.3 and 5.0.1820 inclusive, the SetLogFile method is accessible, and the control is enabled in the environment.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Foxit PDF SDK to version 5.0.2.924 or later. If the ActiveX control is not required, disable or remove it to reduce attack surface.

Fix this in Foxit Pdf Sdk Activex Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-8074 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-8074 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data