CVE-2014-8551
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe WinCC server in Siemens SIMATIC WinCC 7.0 through SP3, 7.2 before Update 9, and 7.3 before Update 2; SIMATIC PCS 7 7.1 through SP4, 8.0 through SP2, and 8.1; and TIA Portal 13 before Update 6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe WinCC server in Siemens SIMATIC WinCC (versions 7.0-7.3), SIMATIC PCS 7 (versions 7.1-8.1), and TIA Portal 13 contains a vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted network packets. This is a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the ICS/SCADA server component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.1= 7.1= 8.0= 8.1= 13.0= 7.0= 7.2= 7.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Siemens SIMATIC productsCheck the Windows Control Panel 'Programs and Features' or use 'Get-ItemProperty' in PowerShell for registry entries under HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Siemens to enumerate installed Siemens software. Look for WinCC, PCS 7, or TIA Portal.Affected if Any of the following products are installed: SIMATIC WinCC 7.0/7.2/7.3, SIMATIC PCS 7 7.1/8.0/8.1, or TIA Portal 13.0
-
Verify WinCC server component versionLocate the WinCC installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\Siemens\WinCC) and check the version information of the WinCC executable files, or query the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Siemens\WinCC\Setup for the installed version string.Affected if The WinCC server component version matches 7.0, 7.2, or 7.3
-
Check PCS 7 installation versionQuery the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Siemens\PCS7 or check the installation path for SIMATIC PCS 7, then determine the version from the setup metadata.Affected if PCS 7 version is 7.1, 8.0, or 8.1
-
Confirm TIA Portal versionCheck the installed programs list or registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Siemens\TIA for TIA Portal version 13.0 specifically.Affected if TIA Portal version equals 13.0
-
Assess network exposure of WinCC serverReview Windows Firewall rules and network configuration to determine if the WinCC server ports (default: TCP 102, 80, 443) are listening on external or untrusted network interfaces.Affected if The WinCC server component is accessible from network segments outside the ICS/SCADA trust zone
If any of the affected Siemens products (WinCC 7.0/7.2/7.3, PCS 7 7.1/8.0/8.1, or TIA Portal 13.0) are installed AND the WinCC server component is network-accessible, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-provided patches: Update WinCC to 7.2 Update 9+/7.3 Update 2+, TIA Portal to 13 Update 6+, and PCS 7 to the latest supported versions. Additionally, network segment the WinCC server and restrict external access to minimize attack surface.
WinCC 7.2 Update 9+ / WinCC 7.3 Update 2+ / TIA Portal 13 Update 6+ / PCS 7 latest available SP
- 1. Identify the specific product and version from WinCC 7.0-7.3, PCS 7 7.1-8.1, or TIA Portal 13 in your environment
- 2. For WinCC 7.2: Apply Update 9 or later
- 3. For WinCC 7.3: Apply Update 2 or later
- 4. For WinCC 7.0 SP3: Apply all available subsequent updates or migrate to a supported version
- 5. For PCS 7: Apply the latest available service pack for your version (SP5 for 7.1, SP3 for 8.0, SP1 or later for 8.1)
- 6. For TIA Portal 13: Apply Update 6 or later
- 7. After patching, verify the WinCC/PCS 7/TIA Portal services start normally and monitor for any anomalies
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-8551 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-8551 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data