CVE-2014-8572
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHuawei AC6605 with software V200R001C00; AC6605 with software V200R002C00; ACU with software V200R001C00; ACU with software V200R002C00; S2300, S3300, S2700, S3700 with software V100R006C05 and earlier versions; S5300, S5700, S6300, S6700 with software V100R006, V200R001, V200R002, V200R003, V200R005C00SPC300 and earlier versions; S7700, S9300, S9300E, S9700 with software V100R006, V200R001, V200R002, V200R003, V200R005C00SPC300 and earlier versions could allow remote attackers to send a special SSH packet to the VRP device to cause a denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in Huawei VRP devices where remote attackers can send a specially crafted SSH packet to cause the device to become unresponsive. The vulnerability affects multiple switch models (S2300, S3300, S2700, S3700, S5300, S5700, S6300, S6700, S7700, S9300, S9300E, S9700) and wireless controllers (AC6605, ACU) running specific software versions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= ac6605_v200r001c00= ac6605_v200r002c00= acu_v200r001c00= acu_v200r002c00= v100r006c05<= v200r005c00spc300= v100r006= v200r001= v200r002= v200r003<= v200r005c00spc300= v100r006= v200r001= v200r002= v200r003<= v200r005c00spc300= v100r006= v200r001= v200r002= v200r003<= v200r005c00spc300= v100r006= v200r001= v200r002= v200r003<= v200r005c00spc300= v100r006= v200r001= v200r002= v200r003CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelRun the command `display device` or `display version` on the Huawei VRP device to confirm the product model (e.g., S5300, S5700, AC6605, etc.)Affected if The device model matches one of the affected series: S2300, S3300, S2700, S3700, S5300, S5700, S6300, S6700, S7700, S9300, S9300E, S9700, AC6605, or ACU
-
Identify the firmware versionRun `display version` to obtain the current VRP software version installed on the deviceAffected if The firmware version matches any of the listed vulnerable versions: v100r006c05, v200r001c00, v200r002c00, v100r006, v200r001, v200r002, v200r003, or any version <= v200r005c00spc300 for the S5300/S5700/S6700/S6300/S7700 series
-
Check if SSH management is enabledRun `display ssh server status` or `display current-configuration | include ssh` to determine whether the SSH server service is enabled on the deviceAffected if SSH server is enabled and configured, as the vulnerability is triggered by specially crafted SSH packets sent to the device
-
Verify the management interface configurationRun `display ip interface` or check the current-configuration for SSH-related service bindings to confirm which interfaces accept SSH management connectionsAffected if SSH service is bound to any management interface (such as vlanif, loopback, or physical ports) that is accessible to untrusted networks
The device is affected if it is one of the listed Huawei VRP models running an affected firmware version AND has SSH management service enabled, allowing remote attackers to send crafted SSH packets to trigger the denial of service condition.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Huawei VRP software to a patched version beyond V200R005C00SPC300 or restrict SSH management access to trusted IP addresses using ACLs as a temporary workaround.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-8572 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-8572 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data