CVE-2014-8639
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMozilla Firefox before 35.0, Firefox ESR 31.x before 31.4, Thunderbird before 31.4, and SeaMonkey before 2.32 do not properly interpret Set-Cookie headers within responses that have a 407 (aka Proxy Authentication Required) status code, which allows remote HTTP proxy servers to conduct session fixation attacks by providing a cookie name that corresponds to the session cookie of the origin server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMozilla Firefox, Firefox ESR, Thunderbird, and SeaMonkey incorrectly process Set-Cookie headers from HTTP 407 (Proxy Authentication Required) responses, treating cookies from the proxy as if they originated from the destination server. This enables remote proxy servers to perform session fixation attacks by injecting session cookie names that override legitimate session cookies from the target website.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 34.0.5= 31.0= 31.1.0= 31.1.1= 31.3.0= 31.2<= 2.31<= 31.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Mozilla productCheck for Firefox, Firefox ESR, Thunderbird, or SeaMonkey installation. On Windows, look in Program Files; on macOS, check /Applications; on Linux, check /usr/lib or package manager listings.Affected if Any of the four affected products (Firefox, Firefox ESR, SeaMonkey, Thunderbird) are installed
-
Determine product version numberFor Firefox: run 'firefox --version' or check Help > About. For Thunderbird: run 'thunderbird --version' or check Help > About. For SeaMonkey: check Help > About. For ESR variants, the version will show 'ESR' designation.Affected if Version matches any affected range: Firefox <=34.0.5, Firefox =31.0/31.1.0/31.1.1/31.3.0, Firefox ESR =31.2, SeaMonkey <=2.31, Thunderbird <=31.3.0
-
Check if HTTP proxy with authentication is configuredIn the browser, go to Options > Advanced > Network > Settings, or check system proxy settings. Look for configured proxy servers that require authentication (username/password).Affected if A proxy requiring authentication is configured and active - this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable
-
Verify proxy authentication can trigger 407 responsesTest browsing through the configured proxy to any HTTPS site. A 407 Proxy Authentication Required response would contain Set-Cookie headers that could be mishandled.Affected if The proxy returns 407 responses with Set-Cookie headers and those cookies override or set session cookies for the destination domain
A user is affected if they run an affected product version AND use an HTTP proxy that requires authentication, allowing the proxy to inject cookies via 407 responses.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate affected Mozilla products to version 35.0 or later for Firefox, 31.4 or later for Firefox ESR and Thunderbird, and 2.32 or later for SeaMonkey. Avoid using untrusted or compromised HTTP proxy servers.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-8639 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.mozilla.org
- linux.oracle.com
- linux.oracle.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.oracle.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- security.gentoo.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-8639 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data