OpenjdkApplication · Oracle

CVE-2014-8873

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-11-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A .desktop file in the Debian openjdk-7 package 7u79-2.5.5-1~deb8u1 includes a MIME type registration that is added to /etc/mailcap by mime-support, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a JAR file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A .desktop file in the Debian openjdk-7 package (7u79-2.5.5-1~deb8u1) registers a MIME type that gets added to /etc/mailcap by mime-support. This improper MIME type handling allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by tricking applications into processing a malicious JAR file through the mailcap mechanism.

MitigationUpdate the openjdk-7 package to the latest patched version in Debian repositories, or remove/modify the problematic .desktop file to prevent incorrect MIME type registration in /etc/mailcap.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenjdkApplication
Affected:= 1.7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify your operating system
    Run: cat /etc/os-release or lsb_release -a to determine if you are using Debian or a Debian-based distribution (like Ubuntu)
    Affected if The system is Debian 8 (jessie) or a derivative with the vulnerable openjdk-7 package
  2. Check if openjdk-7 is installed
    Run: dpkg -l | grep openjdk-7 or which java followed by java -version to identify installed Java packages and their versions
    Affected if OpenJDK 7 version 1.7.0 (specifically packages from Debian repositories around 7u79-2.5.5-1~deb8u1) is installed
  3. Locate the problematic .desktop file
    Search for .desktop files related to Java/JAR handling: find /usr -name '*.desktop' 2>/dev/null | xargs grep -l 'application/x-jar' 2>/dev/null
    Affected if A .desktop file exists that registers the application/x-jar MIME type for JAR files
  4. Verify MIME type registration in mailcap
    Check /etc/mailcap for JAR-related entries: grep -i 'application/x-jar\|application/java' /etc/mailcap
    Affected if The mailcap file contains an entry mapping application/x-jar or related MIME types to a handler, added by the openjdk-7 .desktop file
  5. Confirm version is within affected range
    Compare your installed openjdk-7 version to the affected version 7u79-2.5.5-1~deb8u1 using: dpkg -l openjdk-7-*
    Affected if The installed version matches or predates the vulnerable Debian package version (7u79-2.5.5-1~deb8u1)

You are affected if running a Debian-based system with openjdk-7 installed where a .desktop file registers a JAR MIME type that gets propagated to /etc/mailcap, allowing applications to automatically process JAR files through the mailcap mechanism.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the openjdk-7 package to the latest patched version in Debian repositories, or remove/modify the problematic .desktop file to prevent incorrect MIME type registration in /etc/mailcap.

Fix this in Openjdk Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-8873 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-8873 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data