CVE-2014-8964
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in PCRE 8.36 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or have other unspecified impact via a crafted regular expression, related to an assertion that allows zero repeats.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in PCRE 8.36 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause denial of service or potentially achieve other impact via a crafted regular expression. The flaw stems from an assertion failure that incorrectly handles zero-repeat patterns in regex processing, leading to heap memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.18= 19= 20= 21= 7.0= 7.3= 7.4= 7.5= 7.6= 7.7= 7.0= 7.3= 7.4= 7.6= 7.7= 7.3= 7.6= 7.7= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check PCRE library versionRun `pcregrep --version` or `pcre-config --version` to determine the installed PCRE versionAffected if Version is 8.36 or earlier
-
Check MariaDB server versionRun `mysql --version` or check the mariadb-server package version via `rpm -qa | grep mariadb` or `dpkg -l | grep mariadb`Affected if MariaDB version is 10.0.0 through 10.0.17 (versions prior to 10.0.18)
-
Verify PCRE library linked to databaseRun `ldd $(which mysqld) 2>/dev/null | grep pcre` or check via `strings /usr/sbin/mysqld | grep pcre`Affected if mysqld links to a PCRE library version 8.36 or earlier
-
Check system PCRE package version on FedoraRun `rpm -qa | grep -i pcre` to list installed PCRE packages and their versionsAffected if Any pcre package version is 8.36 or earlier
-
Check PCRE package version on RHELRun `rpm -qa | grep -i pcre` to list installed PCRE packages and their versionsAffected if Any pcre or pcre2 package version corresponds to the vulnerable PCRE 8.36 or earlier library
You are affected if your system runs MariaDB 10.0.0-10.0.17 or has PCRE library version 8.36 or earlier installed and uses regex processing with potentially crafted patterns.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data10.0.18
Upgrade PCRE library to version 8.37 or later to patch the assertion flaw. Applications using PCRE should be rebuilt against the updated library version and tested to ensure regex functionality remains intact.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-8964 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- advisories.mageia.org
- bugs.exim.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.gentoo.org
- www.exim.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-8964 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data