1094b Gps Substation ClockHardware / appliance · Arbiter

CVE-2014-9194

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-01-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Arbiter 1094B GPS Substation Clock allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (disruption) via crafted radio transmissions that spoof GPS satellite broadcasts.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Arbiter 1094B GPS Substation Clock accepts GPS satellite signals without sufficient validation, allowing remote attackers to transmit crafted radio signals that spoof legitimate GPS broadcasts and cause the device to lose synchronization or provide incorrect time, resulting in denial of service for time-dependent substation operations.

MitigationImplement GPS signal spoofing detection and monitoring solutions, deploy cryptographic GPS signal authentication if available from vendor, and segregate critical timing infrastructure on restricted network segments with redundant authoritative time sources.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
1094b Gps Substation ClockHardware / appliance
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Arbiter 1094B device in environment
    Locate the physical device or check network inventory for 'Arbiter 1094B' or '1094B GPS Substation Clock' - this may require physical inspection of telecom/network closets or DCIM records
    Affected if The device is present and operational in the environment
  2. Verify GPS signal reception is active
    Check device status indicators or management interface for GPS signal lock status - look for 'GPS Locked', 'Synchronized', or signal strength indicators on the device front panel or web interface
    Affected if GPS signal is being received and the device shows locked/synchronized status, meaning it is vulnerable to spoofed signals
  3. Check network accessibility of device management interface
    Determine if the device management port (typically Ethernet for configuration/monitoring) is accessible from network segments - check for open ports 80/443 or SNMP exposure
    Affected if The device management interface is reachable from network segments beyond the isolated control room, increasing attack surface for remote exploitation
  4. Monitor for time synchronization anomalies
    Compare device time output against known-good authoritative time sources (such as local atomic clock, PTP grandmaster, or other trusted NTP servers) over a period - log any sudden jumps, step changes, or gradual drift
    Affected if Time discrepancies are detected when compared against independent time references, indicating possible spoofing or loss of synchronization
  5. Inspect for GPS spoofing detection capabilities
    Review device configuration or documentation for any available GPS signal validation, anti-spoofing, or cryptographic authentication settings - check firmware version and available security features
    Affected if Device lacks GPS signal authentication or spoofing detection features, or such features are disabled (note: all versions are affected regardless)

If an Arbiter 1094B GPS Substation Clock is present and actively receiving GPS signals, the environment is affected by this vulnerability since all versions lack sufficient GPS signal validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement GPS signal spoofing detection and monitoring solutions, deploy cryptographic GPS signal authentication if available from vendor, and segregate critical timing infrastructure on restricted network segments with redundant authoritative time sources.

Fix this in 1094b Gps Substation Clock Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
34.0 hours of engineering $6,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-9194 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-9194 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data