Java Web ClientApplication · Clorius Controls A\/s

CVE-2014-9199

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-01-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 01.00.0009b or later.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Clorius Controls Java web client before 01.00.0009g allows remote attackers to discover credentials by sniffing the network for cleartext-equivalent traffic.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Clorius Controls Java web client before version 01.00.0009g transmits credentials in a cleartext-equivalent manner over the network, allowing attackers to intercept and discover authentication credentials via network sniffing.

MitigationUpgrade the Java web client to version 01.00.0009g or later, and ensure all authentication traffic is transmitted over TLS-encrypted HTTPS connections rather than unencrypted channels.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Java Web ClientApplication
Affected:<= 01.00.0009b

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the installed Java web client version
    Access the application or check the JAR file properties for the Clorius Controls Java Web Client, typically found in the application directory or installation folder. Look for version information in the manifest, about dialog, or version metadata file.
    Affected if The displayed version is 01.00.0009b or any earlier version (e.g., 01.00.0009a, 01.00.0008, etc.)
  2. Compare installed version to affected range
    Review the exact version string found. The affected range is any version <= 01.00.0009b. Versions 01.00.0009g and later are not affected.
    Affected if The installed version is 01.00.0009b or lower
  3. Identify the connection protocol configured
    Check the client configuration files or connection settings to determine whether the application is configured to connect using HTTP (unencrypted) or HTTPS (encrypted). Look for the server URL in configuration files or connection settings.
    Affected if The client is configured to connect over HTTP rather than HTTPS
  4. Verify network traffic uses encryption
    Use a network capture tool (such as Wireshark) on the client machine to observe outbound authentication traffic. Inspect whether the credentials are transmitted in cleartext or encrypted.
    Affected if Authentication credentials are observed in cleartext on the network

The environment is affected if the Clorius Controls Java Web Client version is 01.00.0009b or earlier AND credentials are being transmitted over an unencrypted HTTP connection rather than TLS-encrypted HTTPS.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 01.00.0009b
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the Java web client to version 01.00.0009g or later, and ensure all authentication traffic is transmitted over TLS-encrypted HTTPS connections rather than unencrypted channels.

Fix this in Java Web Client Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-9199 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-9199 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data