CVE-2014-9583
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedcommon.c in infosvr in ASUS WRT firmware 3.0.0.4.376_1071, 3.0.0.376.2524-g0013f52, and other versions, as used in RT-AC66U, RT-N66U, and other routers, does not properly check the MAC address for a request, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary commands via a NET_CMD_ID_MANU_CMD packet to UDP port 9999. NOTE: this issue was incorrectly mapped to CVE-2014-10000, but that ID is invalid due to its use as an example of the 2014 CVE ID syntax change.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the infosvr (information server) component of ASUS WRT firmware. The common.c file fails to properly validate MAC addresses in incoming requests, allowing remote attackers to bypass authentication entirely. By sending a specially crafted NET_CMD_ID_MANU_CMD packet to UDP port 9999, an unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary commands on affected routers including RT-AC66U and RT-N66U.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0.0.4.376_3169= 3.0.0.4.376.2524-g0012f52= 3.0.0.4.376_1071CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify router modelAccess router administration interface or check device labeling to confirm the exact model number (RT-AC66U, RT-N66U, or T-Mobile TM-AC1900)Affected if Router is NOT one of RT-AC66U, RT-N66U, or TM-AC1900 models - these are the only affected models listed
-
Check firmware versionLog into router web interface, look for firmware version in Administration > Firmware Version or use 'nvram get firmver' and 'nvram get buildno' via telnet/SSH if availableAffected if Firmware version does NOT match 3.0.0.4.376_3169 (TM-AC1900), 3.0.0.4.376.2524-g0012f52, or 3.0.0.4.376_1071 - only these specific versions are affected
-
Verify UDP port 9999 is listeningUse a network scanner (such as nmap -sU -p 9999 target_ip) from a machine on the same network to check if the infosvr UDP port 9999 is open and respondingAffected if UDP port 9999 is closed or not responding - the vulnerability requires this port to be accessible for exploitation
-
Confirm infosvr service is enabledAccess router via telnet/SSH and run 'ps | grep infosvr' or check router web interface for any 'Info Server' or 'LAN > IPTV' settings that may control this serviceAffected if The infosvr process is not running - the vulnerability only applies when this service is active
-
Test for vulnerable packet responseSend a NET_CMD_ID_MANU_CMD packet (magic bytes 0x0C 0x00 0x04 0x10) to UDP port 9999 using a tool like netcat or custom script and observe if any response is received without authenticationAffected if Port 9999 responds to malformed MAC address requests - this indicates the vulnerable code path is present and exploitable
A user is affected if they run an RT-AC66U, RT-N66U, or TM-AC1900 router with firmware version 3.0.0.4.376_3169, 3.0.0.4.376.2524-g0012f52, or 3.0.0.4.376_1071 AND have UDP port 9999 exposed with infosvr service enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the latest ASUS firmware update for affected router models once released. If no update is available, consider network segmentation to limit exposure of UDP port 9999 or disable the infosvr service if possible.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-9583 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-9583 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data