CVE-2014-9780
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unediteddrivers/video/msm/mdss/mdp3_ctrl.c in the Qualcomm components in Android before 2016-07-05 on Nexus 5, 5X, and 6P devices does not validate start and length values, which allows attackers to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka Android internal bug 28602014 and Qualcomm internal bug CR542222.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe mdp3_ctrl.c driver in Qualcomm's MSM video components lacks validation on start and length parameters when handling memory operations. This allows a malicious Android application to perform out-of-bounds memory reads or writes, potentially achieving privilege escalation to root or kernel-level access on affected Nexus 5, 5X, and 6P devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 6.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'getprop ro.product.model' or check device Settings > About Phone to confirm the exact model nameAffected if Model is Nexus 5, Nexus 5X, or Nexus 6P (the only affected devices)
-
Check Android versionRun 'getprop ro.build.version.release' or check Settings > About Phone > Android versionAffected if Version is 6.0.1 or earlier (6.0 and below)
-
Verify security patch levelRun 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' to see the installed security patch dateAffected if Patch level is earlier than July 2016 (format typically shows YYYY-MM-DD)
-
Confirm vulnerable driver presenceCheck if /dev/msm_mdp or similar video driver nodes exist and are accessible; run 'ls -la /dev/msm*' to enumerate MSM video devicesAffected if The mdp3_ctrl.c driver component is loaded and accessible to applications
Device is affected if it is a Nexus 5, 5X, or 6P running Android 6.0.1 or earlier with a security patch level before July 2016.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the July 2016 Android security patch or later, which contains the corrected Qualcomm video driver with proper bounds checking. Users of affected Nexus devices should ensure they receive and install the monthly security update.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-9780 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-9780 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data