CVE-2014-9988
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile, Snapdragon Mobile, and Snapdragon Wear SD 820A, IPQ4019, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8909W, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 430, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, SD 835, SD 845, SD 450, and SD 850, lack of input validation for message length causes buffer over read in drm_app_encapsulate_save_keys.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer over-read vulnerability exists in the drm_app_encapsulate_save_keys function within multiple Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset variants due to missing input validation for message length. This allows an attacker to read beyond buffer boundaries, potentially exposing sensitive DRM key material or causing denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the chipset modelCheck the device specifications or use system information commands (e.g., 'cat /proc/cpuinfo', 'lspci', or vendor-specific diagnostic tools) to determine the exact Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset model numberAffected if The chipset matches any of these: Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Ipq4019, Sd 820a, Mdm9650, Msm8909w, Sd 210, or Sd 212
-
Verify firmware versionCheck the installed firmware version through the device firmware interface, bootloader, or vendor-provided version information toolAffected if The firmware is from the affected product list and all versions are considered vulnerable
-
Confirm DRM subsystem is activeInspect if the Digital Rights Management component (drm_app_encapsulate_save_keys function) is present and loaded on the system, typically found in DRM-related kernel modules or firmware blobsAffected if The DRM subsystem with the vulnerable function is present and operational on the device
-
Check for the vulnerable functionSearch firmware binaries or kernel modules for the string 'drm_app_encapsulate_save_keys' using binary analysis tools or firmware extraction utilitiesAffected if The function drm_app_encapsulate_save_keys exists in the firmware without the input validation fix for message length
The environment is affected if the device uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipset models (Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Ipq4019, Sd 820a, Mdm9650, Msm8909w, Sd 210, or Sd 212) and contains the vulnerable DRM component with the drm_app_encapsulate_save_keys function.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the April 2018 Android security patch level or later to affected devices, which includes the proper input validation fix for the message length parameter in the affected DRM component.
Android security patch level April 5, 2018 or later (2018-04-05)
- Check the current Android security patch level on the device in Settings > About Phone > Security patch level
- Update the device to receive the Android security patch level released on 2018-04-05 or later
- This is typically done through system updates pushed by the device manufacturer or carrier
- If no update is available from the manufacturer, consider whether the device vendor or carrier provides security updates for the affected Qualcomm components
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,704.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-9988 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-9988 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data