CVE-2015-0110
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Business Process Manager (aka BPM) 7.5.x, 8.0.x, and 8.5.x and WebSphere Lombardi Edition (aka WLE) 7.2.x allow remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions on internal service types via vectors involving the executeServiceByName URL.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Business Process Manager 7.5.x-8.5.x and WebSphere Lombardi Edition 7.2.x contain an access control bypass vulnerability where authenticated users can bypass intended restrictions on internal service types via the executeServiceByName URL endpoint, allowing unauthorized access to privileged service operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.5.0.0= 7.5.0.1= 7.5.1.0= 7.5.1.1= 7.5.1.2= 8.0.0.0= 8.0.1.0= 8.0.1.1= 8.0.1.2= 8.0.1.3= 8.5.0.0= 8.5.0.1= 7.2.0.0= 7.2.0.1= 7.2.0.2= 7.2.0.3= 7.2.0.4= 7.2.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM productDetermine if IBM Business Process Manager, WebSphere Lombardi Edition, or related WebSphere Application Server components are installed on the system. Look for IBM WebSphere directories or check installed software packages.Affected if The product is IBM Business Process Manager 7.5.x-8.5.x, WebSphere Lombardi Edition 7.2.x, or WebSphere Application Server 7.2.x
-
Check product versionUse the product's version detection method (such as the versionInfo command in WebSphere, the Installation Manager, or check product-specific configuration files) to obtain the exact installed version number.Affected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions: 7.5.0.0-7.5.1.2, 8.0.0.0-8.0.1.3, 8.5.0.0-8.5.0.1 for Business Process Manager; 7.2.0.0-7.2.0.5 for Lombardi Edition or WebSphere Application Server
-
Verify executeServiceByName endpoint exposureInspect web application configuration or proxy rules for the executeServiceByName URL endpoint. This endpoint should be restricted to authorized internal service calls only.Affected if The executeServiceByName endpoint is accessible without additional authorization checks beyond basic authentication
-
Review authenticated user role assignmentsCheck the user role mappings for the affected application. Determine which authenticated users have access to internal service operations.Affected if Users with standard (non-admin) authentication can potentially reach privileged service operations through this endpoint
-
Audit internal service type access controlsReview the access control configuration for internal service types to confirm whether proper restrictions are enforced on the executeServiceByName functionality.Affected if Internal service types lack proper role-based restrictions, allowing authenticated users to invoke privileged operations
Your environment is affected if you have IBM Business Process Manager 7.5.x-8.5.x, WebSphere Lombardi Edition 7.2.x, or WebSphere Application Server 7.2.x installed AND the executeServiceByName endpoint is accessible to authenticated users beyond intended restrictions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant IBM security patch for this vulnerability. Additionally, review and tighten user role assignments and consider network-level restrictions to limit exposure until patching is complete.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-0110 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-0110 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data