CVE-2015-0459
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 5.0u81, 6u91, 7u76, and 8u40, and JavaFX 2.2.76, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to 2D, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0491.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCritical-severity vulnerability in Oracle Java SE and JavaFX affecting the 2D graphics subsystem. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable and allows complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The specific attack vector and technical details are not disclosed in the advisory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.5.0= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 1.8.0= 1.5.0= 1.6.0= 1.7.0= 1.8.0= 2.2.76= 11.0= 13.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Java JDK or JRE versionRun 'java -version' or 'java -fullversion' from command line to obtain the exact version stringAffected if Version matches 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0, or 1.8.0 series (prior to 8u40) and the 2D graphics subsystem is in use
-
Verify JavaFX version if installedCheck for JavaFX runtime installation; on affected systems inspect the javafx runtime version via 'java -jar' or check installed packagesAffected if JavaFX version is 2.2.76 or earlier and JavaFX 2D rendering is used
-
Confirm 2D graphics subsystem usageIdentify whether Java applications invoke java.awt.Graphics2D, Java2D API, or any 2D rendering operations; review application code or runtime behaviorAffected if Any Java application rendering 2D graphics using the Java 2D API is potentially vulnerable
-
Check OS package versions on LinuxOn SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 11.0 or openSUSE 13.2, query installed Java packages via package manager (zypper or rpm)Affected if System-installed Java packages are the affected Oracle JRE/JDK versions listed
The environment is affected if Oracle Java JDK/JRE versions 1.5.0 through 1.8.0 (prior to 8u40) or JavaFX 2.2.76 are installed AND the Java 2D graphics subsystem is being used by any running application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Java versions beyond 8u40 (such as 8u45+ or later JDK 8 releases) and apply subsequent Oracle Critical Patch Updates. For legacy systems requiring Java 5/6, consider migration to supported Java versions as these releases are end-of-life.
Java 5.0u85+/Java 6u95+/Java 7u80+/Java 8u45+ (or migrate to Java 11/17 LTS for long-term support)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Java version by running 'java -version' or 'javac -version'
- 2. For Java 5.0: Upgrade to Java 5.0u85 or later (contact Oracle for extended support if on Java 5)
- 3. For Java 6: Upgrade to Java 6u95 or later (contact Oracle for extended support if on Java 6)
- 4. For Java 7: Upgrade to Java 7u80 or later
- 5. For Java 8: Upgrade to Java 8u45 or later (Java 8 reached end of public updates in January 2019; consider migrating to newer LTS version like Java 11 or 17
- 6. For JavaFX 2.2: Upgrade to JavaFX 2.2.80 or later, or migrate to newer JavaFX versions
- 7. Download fixed versions from Oracle's official Java SE download page (https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/downloads/)
- 8. Install the new Java version and update JAVA_HOME environment variable to point to the new installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-0459 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.oracle.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- security.gentoo.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-0459 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data