CVE-2015-0771
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe IKE implementation in the WS-IPSEC-3 service module in Cisco IOS 12.2 on Catalyst 6500 devices allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (device reload) by sending a crafted message during IPsec tunnel setup, aka Bug ID CSCur70505.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDenial of service vulnerability in the IKE (Internet Key Exchange) implementation in the WS-IPSEC-3 service module for Cisco IOS 12.2 on Catalyst 6500 switches. An authenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted message during IPsec tunnel setup that triggers a device reload.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.2\(33\)sxj8= 12.2sxjCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Catalyst 6500 hardware platformUse 'show version' command to verify the device model is Cisco Catalyst 6500 series switchAffected if Device is not a Catalyst 6500 series switch - not affected
-
Verify WS-IPSEC-3 module is installedUse 'show module' or 'show hardware' command to check for WS-IPSEC-3 service module in the chassisAffected if WS-IPSEC-3 module is not present - not affected
-
Check Cisco IOS versionUse 'show version' command and look for IOS version 12.2(33)sxj8 or 12.2sxj specificallyAffected if IOS version equals 12.2(33)sxj8 or 12.2sxj - potentially affected
-
Verify IKE/IPsec is configuredUse 'show crypto isakmp sa' or 'show crypto ipsec sa' commands to check if any IKE/IPsec tunnels are active or configuredAffected if No IKE/IPsec tunnels are configured and the WS-IPSEC-3 module has no active security associations - lower risk
Device is affected only if it is a Catalyst 6500 with WS-IPSEC-3 module installed, running Cisco IOS 12.2(33)sxj8 or 12.2sxj, and has IKE/IPsec configured or active tunnels.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco IOS to a version that addresses CSCur70505, or if the WS-IPSEC-3 module is unused, consider disabling it to reduce attack surface.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-0771 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-0771 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data