CVE-2015-0869
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedI-O DATA DEVICE NP-BBRM routers allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (SSDP reflection) via UPnP requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe I-O DATA DEVICE NP-BBRM router has an exposed UPnP service that can be exploited for SSDP reflection attacks, allowing remote attackers to amplify traffic and cause denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:C/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NP-BBRM router in your networkLog into your router admin interface (typically at 192.168.0.1 or similar) or check the physical device label to confirm the model is I-O DATA DEVICE NP-BBRM. Document the firmware version if visible.Affected if The device is an NP-BBRM router of any firmware version.
-
Verify UPnP service statusAccess the router web administration panel and navigate to the UPnP settings section (often under 'Advanced', 'Network', or 'NAT' settings). Check whether the UPnP option is enabled or disabled.Affected if UPnP is turned ON in the router configuration.
-
Confirm UPnP port exposure to external networkFrom an external network (or using an online port check tool), attempt to reach the router's UPnP service on UDP port 1900 (SSDP). You can also check router firewall rules to see if inbound UDP port 1900 is permitted.Affected if UDP port 1900 (SSDP) is open to the internet and responds to external requests.
-
Monitor for SSDP traffic patternsUse network logging or IDS to detect incoming SSDP (Simple Service Discovery Protocol) requests to your public IP on port 1900. Look for repeated SSDP M-SEARCH requests from external sources.Affected if Your external IP is receiving SSDP M-SEARCH requests from unknown external hosts, indicating potential reflection probing.
You are affected if you operate an NP-BBRM router with UPnP enabled and that UPnP service (UDP port 1900) is reachable from the internet.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable UPnP functionality on affected NP-BBRM routers, or apply available firmware updates; consider network-level filtering of SSDP traffic at perimeter defenses.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-0869 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-0869 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data