CVE-2015-1029
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe puppetlabs-stdlib module 2.1 through 3.0 and 4.1.0 through 4.5.x before 4.5.1 for Puppet 2.8.8 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges or obtain sensitive information by prepopulating the fact cache.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe puppetlabs-stdlib module versions 2.1-3.0 and 4.1.0-4.5.x for Puppet 2.8.8 and earlier contains a vulnerability where authenticated remote users can prepopulate the fact cache to elevate privileges or obtain sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.1.0= 2.1.1= 2.1.2= 2.1.3= 2.2.0= 2.2.1= 2.3.0= 2.3.1= 2.3.2= 2.3.3= 2.4.0= 2.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed puppetlabs-stdlib module versionRun 'puppet module list' or check the module metadata in the Puppet modulepath to find the installed version of puppetlabs-stdlibAffected if The installed version matches 2.1.0 through 3.0, or 4.1.0 through 4.5.x
-
Identify the Puppet versionRun 'puppet --version' to determine the Puppet master or agent versionAffected if Puppet version is 2.8.8 or earlier
-
Confirm fact caching is enabledInspect Puppet configuration files (puppet.conf) for the 'factsync' setting or any fact cache related configuration under the [master] or [agent] sectionsAffected if Fact caching or fact synchronization is enabled in the Puppet configuration
-
Assess network exposureReview network access controls and authentication settings for the Puppet master to determine if remote authenticated users can submit custom factsAffected if The Puppet master accepts authenticated remote connections without strict fact submission controls
You are affected if your environment runs Puppet 2.8.8 or earlier with puppetlabs-stdlib version 2.1-3.0 or 4.1.0-4.5.x and has fact caching enabled with accessible Puppet master services.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade puppetlabs-stdlib to version 4.5.1 or later, or upgrade Puppet beyond version 2.8.8 to remediate this vulnerability.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-1029 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-1029 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data