CVE-2015-1312
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Dealer Portal in SAP ERP does not properly restrict access, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, gain privileges, and possibly have other unspecified impact via unknown vectors, aka SAP Note 2000401. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the details are obtained solely from third party information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceThe Dealer Portal in SAP ERP contains an access control vulnerability where proper authorization restrictions are not enforced, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to potentially access sensitive information and elevate their privileges. The vulnerability stems from missing or inadequate access control checks within the Dealer Portal module.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Dealer Portal module exposureIdentify if the Dealer Portal web module is exposed in your SAP ERP environment by checking the SAP Gateway or ICM configuration for Dealer Portal-related endpoints. Consult your SAP system documentation or contact your SAP administrator to determine if the Dealer Portal is deployed and accessible.Affected if The Dealer Portal module is enabled and accessible without authentication barriers.
-
Confirm SAP ERP installationLocate your SAP ERP installation and determine the version by using transaction code SM51 in the SAP GUI, or by checking the SAP system information via the SAP MMC or SAP Management Console.Affected if SAP Enterprise Resource Planning is installed and the Dealer Portal module is present.
-
Test unauthenticated Dealer Portal accessAttempt to access the Dealer Portal URL (consult your SAP documentation for the specific URL path, typically under /sap/bc/ or /sap/public/) using a web browser or HTTP tool without providing any authentication credentials. Observe whether the system grants access to portal content.Affected if The Dealer Portal returns sensitive content or allows navigation without requiring valid authentication.
-
Check for missing authorization in Dealer PortalUse SAP transaction code SU53 immediately after attempting Dealer Portal access to verify if proper authorization checks were performed. Review the system logs (transaction code SM37 or SLG1) for any access control violations related to the Dealer Portal.Affected if Authorization checks are not enforced or are bypassed, allowing unauthenticated or unauthorized access.
-
Verify SAP Note 2000401 applicationCheck whether SAP Note 2000401 has been applied to your system by using transaction code SNOTE or by reviewing your SAP patch inventory. This note addresses the access control deficiencies in the Dealer Portal.Affected if SAP Note 2000401 has not been applied and the system still exhibits access control gaps in the Dealer Portal.
Your environment is affected if the Dealer Portal module is enabled in your SAP ERP installation and SAP Note 2000401 has not been applied, allowing unauthenticated or unauthorized access to sensitive portal content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply SAP Note 2000401 which addresses the access control deficiencies in the Dealer Portal. Conduct thorough authorization testing post-patch to verify proper access restrictions are enforced for all user roles.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-1312 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-1312 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data