CVE-2015-1469
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedtime.htm in the web interface on SerVision HVG Video Gateway devices with firmware through 2.2.26a100 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges by leveraging a cookie received in an HTTP response, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-0929 and CVE-2015-0930.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe time.htm page in the web interface of SerVision HVG Video Gateway devices with firmware through version 2.2.26a100 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability where authenticated users can gain elevated privileges by manipulating cookies received in HTTP responses.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.2.26a100CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device modelAccess the device web interface or check the device label/documentation to verify the model is SerVision HVG Video GatewayAffected if The device is not a SerVision HVG Video Gateway - the CVE does not apply
-
Check firmware versionLog into the device web interface and navigate to the system information or firmware version page, or check via the device administrative consoleAffected if Firmware version is 2.2.26a100 or earlier (any version up to and including 2.2.26a100)
-
Verify web interface is accessibleAttempt to access the device web interface via HTTP/HTTPS on the configured port (typically 80 or 443)Affected if The web interface is accessible and the time.htm page loads - the vulnerable component is present
-
Confirm time.htm page existsNavigate to the time.htm page within the web interface path (typically http://[device IP]/time.htm)Affected if The time.htm page loads successfully, indicating the vulnerable endpoint is present and exploitable by authenticated users
You are affected if you have a SerVision HVG Video Gateway device running firmware version 2.2.26a100 or earlier with the web interface and time.htm page accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the device firmware to a version beyond 2.2.26a100; if no update is available, restrict or disable remote web interface access to untrusted users.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-1469 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-1469 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data