Server And Application MonitorApplication · Solarwinds

CVE-2015-1501

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-02-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The factory.loadExtensionFactory function in TSUnicodeGraphEditorControl in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor (SAM) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a UNC path to a crafted binary.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The vulnerability exists in the TSUnicodeGraphEditorControl component of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor. The factory.loadExtensionFactory function fails to properly validate input paths, allowing attackers to specify a UNC path pointing to a crafted malicious binary which gets loaded and executed, achieving arbitrary code execution.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied patch from SolarWinds for this vulnerability. As defense-in-depth, restrict outbound SMB connections to only trusted internal servers and monitor for suspicious UNC path usage.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Server And Application MonitorApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor installation
    Check for the presence of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor in installed programs or by searching for its executable files on the system
    Affected if The software is installed - all versions are affected per vendor scope
  2. Locate TSUnicodeGraphEditorControl component
    Search for files or components named TSUnicodeGraphEditorControl or related DLLs within the SolarWinds installation directory
    Affected if The component exists in the installation - this is the vulnerable component
  3. Inspect loadExtensionFactory function usage
    Review application configuration files, logs, or code that invokes the factory.loadExtensionFactory method to see if it accepts path parameters
    Affected if The function accepts external path input without validation - this enables the UNC path injection
  4. Check for UNC path configurations
    Search configuration files, registry, or application settings for UNC paths (paths starting with \\ ) that may be passed to the vulnerable function
    Affected if UNC paths are used in configurations that feed into loadExtensionFactory - this is the exploitation vector
  5. Monitor for suspicious SMB/UNC path activity
    Review network logs for outbound SMB connections from the SolarWinds server to unexpected or external UNC paths
    Affected if SMB connections to untrusted or external UNC paths are observed - indicates potential exploitation attempt

If SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is installed with the TSUnicodeGraphEditorControl component and external UNC paths can be passed to the loadExtensionFactory function, the environment is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution via UNC path injection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied patch from SolarWinds for this vulnerability. As defense-in-depth, restrict outbound SMB connections to only trusted internal servers and monitor for suspicious UNC path usage.

Fix this in Server And Application Monitor Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-1501 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-1501 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data