CVE-2015-1631
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMicrosoft Exchange Server 2013 SP1 and Cumulative Update 7 allows remote attackers to spoof meeting organizers via unspecified vectors, aka "Exchange Forged Meeting Request Spoofing Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a spoofing vulnerability in Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 SP1 and Cumulative Update 7 that allows remote attackers to forge meeting requests and impersonate legitimate meeting organizers. Attackers can exploit this to trick users into attending fraudulent meetings or revealing sensitive information through socially engineered meeting invitations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2013CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Exchange Server 2013 is installedOpen Exchange Management Shell and run: Get-ExchangeServer | Select Name,-AdServer,Domain,VersionAffected if No Exchange Server 2013 is found in the environment, the system is not affected by this CVE
-
Determine the Exchange Server 2013 versionIn Exchange Management Shell, run: Get-ExchangeServer | Format-List Name,Edition,AdminDisplayVersionAffected if The version displayed shows Exchange Server 2013 SP1 or Cumulative Update 7 (CU7)
-
Confirm the exact build numberRun: Get-ExchangeServer | Get-MailboxServer | Select-Object Name,*Version* or check the build number in the Exchange Administration Center under Servers > ServersAffected if The build number matches the vulnerable releases for SP1 or CU7 specifically
If Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 SP1 or Cumulative Update 7 is installed, the environment is vulnerable to meeting request spoofing attacks and may be affected by CVE-2015-1631.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate Microsoft security patch for this vulnerability to Exchange Server 2013, or upgrade to a patched cumulative update version. Verify meeting request authentication mechanisms function correctly after patching.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-1631 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-1631 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data