CVE-2015-1804
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe bdfReadCharacters function in bitmap/bdfread.c in X.Org libXfont before 1.4.9 and 1.5.x before 1.5.1 does not properly perform type conversion for metrics values, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds memory access) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted BDF font file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe bdfReadCharacters function in libXfont's bitmap/bdfread.c fails to properly perform type conversion for metrics values when parsing BDF (Bitmap Distribution Format) font files. This improper type conversion allows a crafted BDF font file to trigger out-of-bounds memory access, leading to denial of service and potential arbitrary code execution by remote authenticated users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.4.8= 1.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed libXfont versionRun 'rpm -q libXfont' or 'dpkg -l libxfont' or check '/usr/lib/libXfont.so*' with 'ldd --version' or examine the library file directlyAffected if Version is 1.4.8 or lower, or exactly 1.5.0
-
Confirm BDF font parsing is accessibleCheck if libXfont is loaded by X server or font server processes via 'ps aux | grep -E "xfs|Xorg"' and verify font path configuration in '/etc/X11/fs/config' or 'xset -q'Affected if BDF font loading is enabled and accessible to processes using libXfont
-
Inspect font path for BDF font filesExamine font directories listed in font path (commonly /usr/share/fonts or custom paths) for .bdf files using 'find /usr/share/fonts -name "*.bdf" 2>/dev/null'Affected if Untrusted or user-supplied BDF font files can be loaded from the configured font path
Your environment is affected if libXfont version is 1.4.8 or lower, or exactly 1.5.0, AND BDF font files can be loaded from an accessible font path.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate libXfont to version 1.4.9 or 1.5.1 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict or disable loading of untrusted BDF font files and limit font path access to trusted sources.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-1804 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.x.org
- advisories.mageia.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.debian.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- security.gentoo.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-1804 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data