FedoraOperating system · Fedoraproject

CVE-2015-1815

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-03-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.2.21 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The get_rpm_nvr_by_file_path_temporary function in util.py in setroubleshoot before 3.2.22 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a file name.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a command injection vulnerability in the setroubleshoot SELinux troubleshooting tool. The get_rpm_nvr_by_file_path_temporary function in util.py fails to sanitize shell metacharacters in filenames before passing them to shell commands, allowing remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary OS commands.

MitigationUpgrade setroubleshoot to version 3.2.22 or later. Until then, restrict access to systems running vulnerable versions and monitor for suspicious filename patterns containing characters like ;, |, &, $, or backticks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FedoraOperating system
Affected:= 22
SetroubleshootApplication
Affected:<= 3.2.21

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if setroubleshoot package is installed
    Run 'rpm -q setroubleshoot' on Fedora-based systems
    Affected if The package is not installed or the command returns an error indicating the package is missing
  2. Determine installed setroubleshoot version
    Run 'rpm -q --info setroubleshoot' and look for the Version field in the output
    Affected if The version returned is 3.2.21 or lower
  3. Verify vulnerable code path exists
    Locate util.py in the setroubleshoot installation (typically in /usr/share/setroubleshoot or via 'rpm -ql setroubleshoot') and check if the function get_rpm_nvr_by_file_path_temporary is present
    Affected if The function exists in the installed version, indicating the vulnerable code path is present
  4. Check if setroubleshoot service is active
    Run 'systemctl status setroubleshoot' or check if the SELinux troubleshooting daemon processes are running
    Affected if The setroubleshoot service is running and actively processing SELinux events, which would trigger the vulnerable function when analyzing file paths

A system is affected if setroubleshoot version 3.2.21 or earlier is installed and the vulnerable function exists in the codebase, with increased risk if the setroubleshoot service is actively processing SELinux audit events.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.2.21
Interim mitigation

Upgrade setroubleshoot to version 3.2.22 or later. Until then, restrict access to systems running vulnerable versions and monitor for suspicious filename patterns containing characters like ;, |, &, $, or backticks.

Recommended fix High confidence

setroubleshoot version 3.2.22 or later

  1. Update the Fedora 22 package metadata: dnf check-update or yum check-update
  2. Upgrade setroubleshoot to version 3.2.22 or later: dnf upgrade setroubleshoot or yum update setroubleshoot
  3. Verify the installed version is 3.2.22 or higher: rpm -q setroubleshoot

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Fedora Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-1815 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-1815 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data