CVE-2015-1855
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedverify_certificate_identity in the OpenSSL extension in Ruby before 2.0.0 patchlevel 645, 2.1.x before 2.1.6, and 2.2.x before 2.2.2 does not properly validate hostnames, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers via vectors related to (1) multiple wildcards, (1) wildcards in IDNA names, (3) case sensitivity, and (4) non-ASCII characters.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe verify_certificate_identity function in Ruby's OpenSSL extension fails to properly validate hostnames against SSL/TLS certificates. Specific flaws include improper handling of multiple wildcards in a single certificate name, incorrect validation of wildcards in Internationalized Domain Names (IDNA), case-sensitive hostname comparisons instead of case-insensitive, and mishandling of non-ASCII characters. These weaknesses allow remote attackers to spoof legitimate HTTPS servers using specially crafted certificates.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.1.0, < 2.1.6>= 2.2.0, < 2.2.2= 2.0.0= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0< 50292= 1.0.0>= 3.0.0, < 3.8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Ruby versionRun 'ruby --version' or 'ruby -e "puts RUBY_VERSION"' to get the Ruby version numberAffected if The version is 2.0.0 (any patch level), 2.1.0 through 2.1.5, or 2.2.0 through 2.2.1 (these are the vulnerable versions)
-
Check Puppet Agent versionRun 'puppet --version' or check the installed puppet-agent package versionAffected if The version is exactly 1.0.0 (this version ships with vulnerable Ruby)
-
Check Puppet Enterprise versionRun 'puppet --version' on a Puppet Enterprise node or check the PE version via the console or 'puppet-enterprise-installer --version'Affected if The version is 3.0.0 through 3.7.x (these ship with vulnerable Ruby)
-
Verify SSL/TLS certificate verification is in useReview application code for use of Net::HTTP, OpenSSL::SSL, or any Ruby library that performs HTTPS connections with certificate verification enabled (verify_mode set to VERIFY_PEER)Affected if Your Ruby code makes HTTPS requests that verify server certificates AND you are running a vulnerable Ruby version listed above - the vulnerability only affects connections that perform hostname verification
You are affected if you run any of the vulnerable Ruby versions (2.0.0, 2.1.0-2.1.5, or 2.2.0-2.2.1) or vulnerable Puppet versions (Agent 1.0.0 or Enterprise 3.0.0-3.7.x) AND your application performs HTTPS connections that verify SSL/TLS certificates using Ruby's built-in OpenSSL extension.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.1.62.2.23.8.0
Upgrade Ruby to version 2.0.0p645, 2.1.6, 2.2.2 or later to include the fixed verify_certificate_identity implementation. For legacy systems that cannot upgrade, consider implementing hostname verification logic at the application layer using more robust libraries.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-1855 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-1855 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data