CVE-2015-2123
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in HP NonStop Safeguard Security Software H06.x, L15.02, and J06.x before J06.19 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges by leveraging Expand access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePrivilege escalation vulnerability in HP NonStop Safeguard Security Software allows remote authenticated users to gain elevated privileges by leveraging the Expand access mechanism. The vulnerability affects versions H06.x, L15.02, and J06.x prior to J06.19.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= h06.29<= j06.18.01<= l15.02CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Safeguard versionUse the Safeguard version query command or check the system configuration file that displays the current software version. Common methods include running the version utility provided with Safeguard or checking the software manifest.Affected if The installed version is H06.x at H06.29 or lower, J06.x at J06.18.01 or lower, or L15.02 at any subversion level (L15.02.x where x is any value).
-
Confirm Safeguard Security is actively runningVerify that the HP NonStop Safeguard Security Software process or service is running on the system. Check system processes or use the Safeguard status command if available.Affected if Safeguard Security software is installed and running, regardless of configuration state.
-
Check Expand access mechanism configurationInspect the Safeguard configuration for the Expand access mechanism. This typically involves reviewing the access control policy files or using Safeguard administrative commands to display Expand permissions.Affected if The Expand access mechanism is enabled and allows authenticated users to escalate privileges beyond their assigned role.
-
Review user access permissionsExamine the access control lists or user privilege assignments within Safeguard to identify which users have Expand access permissions granted.Affected if Any authenticated user account has been granted Expand access rights that exceed the intended least-privilege baseline.
Your environment is affected if the installed Safeguard version falls within the vulnerable ranges (H06.x <= H06.29, J06.x <= J06.18.01, or any L15.02.x) AND the Expand access mechanism is configured or enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch (J06.19 or later for J06.x, and corresponding patches for H06.x and L15.02) to remediate this vulnerability. Until patching is feasible, restrict network access to minimize attack surface and enforce least-privilege principles for authenticated users.
J06.19 or later for J06.x line; newer than h06.29 for H06.x; newer than l15.02 for L15.02
- 1. Identify the current version of HP NonStop Safeguard Security Software running in your environment.
- 2. If running J06.x version <= j06.18.01, upgrade to version J06.19 or later.
- 3. If running H06.x version <= h06.29, upgrade to a version newer than h06.29 (contact HP/HPE for exact fixed H06.x release).
- 4. If running L15.02 version <= l15.02, upgrade to a version newer than l15.02 (contact HP/HPE for exact fixed L15.02 release).
- 5. After upgrading, verify the Safeguard Security Software is functioning correctly and that the Unspecific vulnerability related to Expand access privilege escalation is resolved.
- 6. Test any workflows that rely on Expand functionality to ensure normal operation post-upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-2123 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-2123 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data