CVE-2015-2192
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInteger overflow in the dissect_osd2_cdb_continuation function in epan/dissectors/packet-scsi-osd.c in the SCSI OSD dissector in Wireshark 1.12.x before 1.12.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a crafted length field in a packet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger overflow in Wireshark's SCSI OSD dissector (packet-scsi-osd.c) in the dissect_osd2_cdb_continuation function allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted length field that triggers an infinite loop.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.12.0= 1.12.1= 1.12.2= 1.12.3= 13.1= 13.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Wireshark installation and versionRun 'wireshark --version' or 'tshark --version' to determine the installed Wireshark versionAffected if The version displayed is 1.12.0, 1.12.1, 1.12.2, or 1.12.3
-
Verify SCSI OSD dissector is enabledOpen Wireshark GUI, go to Analyze > Enabled Protocols, or run 'tshark -G protocols' and look for SCSI_OSD in the list; in GUI check if 'SCSI OSD' is checked in enabled protocolsAffected if The SCSI OSD dissector is enabled (checked) in the enabled protocols list
-
Confirm packet-scsi-osd.c is loadedExamine Wireshark plugins or dissector directory for packet-scsi-osd.c presence; on Linux check /usr/lib/wireshark/plugins/ or equivalent path for scsi-osd dissector moduleAffected if The SCSI OSD dissector module exists and is loaded in the Wireshark installation
-
Check OpenSUSE package version if applicableOn OpenSUSE systems, run 'rpm -qa | grep wireshark' to check the installed package versionAffected if The installed package version corresponds to Wireshark 1.12.0-1.12.3 on OpenSUSE 13.1 or 13.2
A user is affected if Wireshark version 1.12.0 through 1.12.3 is installed AND the SCSI OSD dissector is enabled, allowing a crafted packet with malicious length field to trigger an infinite loop during packet dissection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Wireshark to version 1.12.4 or later to patch the vulnerability, or temporarily disable the SCSI OSD dissector when analyzing untrusted network captures.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-2192 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-2192 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data